A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Physiotherapists prioritise compassionate and patient-centred care while navigating systemic constraints and ethical dilemmas in cancer rehabilitation: a mixed-methods study. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Question: How do physiotherapists address bioethical issues in cancer rehabilitation? What drives physiotherapists' clinical actions regarding non-disclosure, patient autonomy, risk-benefit balance and treatment withdrawal?

Design: A mixed-methods study with an explanatory sequential design.

Participants: 681 Italian registered physiotherapists recruited via the National Federation of Physiotherapists' Registers.

Intervention: An online survey assessed physiotherapists' ethical responses, followed by focus groups with participants whose survey responses aligned with key bioethical principles: beneficence/non-maleficence, self-determination, justice/equity, defensive prudence and compassionate care.

Outcome Measures: Quantitative data identified bioethical principles adherence patterns, while qualitative analysis explored the reasoning behind these ethical stances.

Results: Quantitative findings highlighted compassionate care as the most emphasised principle (29%), followed by self-determination (26%) and defensive prudence (23%). Beneficence/non-maleficence (16%) and justice and equity (6%) were less prioritised. Qualitative analysis identified five themes: functional recovery as dignity ('clinical good is the patient good'), patient autonomy ('patient knows better'), equity concerns ('everyone deserves care'), risk aversion ('it's better not to take risks') and the relational nature of care ('relationships can heal'). The mixed-methods integration showed how physiotherapists balance ethical ideals with systemic constraints, highlighting the importance of care equity, not underscored by the sole quantitative data.

Conclusion: Physiotherapists working in cancer rehabilitation prioritise compassionate and patient-centred care while facing systemic constraints, risks and professional responsibilities. This study offers a framework for future research internationally and on other healthcare professionals.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2025.03.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

systemic constraints
12
prioritise compassionate
8
compassionate patient-centred
8
patient-centred care
8
cancer rehabilitation
8
mixed-methods study
8
patient autonomy
8
bioethical principles
8
defensive prudence
8
qualitative analysis
8

Similar Publications