Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) is a life-threatening aortic disease with an increasing incidence, which requires accurate risk stratification tools for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). This multicenter retrospective study aimed to enhance the risk prediction of severe adverse events post TEVAR in patients with TBAD by improving the Age, Creatinine, and Ejection Fraction (ACEF) score.
Methods: This multicenter retrospective study enrolled 547 patients with TBAD who underwent TEVAR between 2015 and 2020. The training cohort (n = 382) from Fujian Medical University Union Hospital was used for model development, whereas the validation cohort (n = 165) from two external centers evaluated performance. Independent risk factors were identified using multivariate logistic regression. The novel composite risk score (ACEF-TBAD) combined age, creatinine, and ejection fraction with hypertension, D-dimer/fibrinogen ratio (DFR), and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curves, decision curve analysis, and reclassification indices.
Results: The ACEF-TBAD score demonstrated superior predictive accuracy compared with the original ACEF, modified ACEF, and EuroSCORE II models, with area under the curve values of 0.922 in the training dataset and 0.829 in the validation dataset. Key determinants included hypertension (odds ratio [OR], 4.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03-11.58; P < .001), DFR (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.16-1.45; P < .001), ACEF score (OR, 4.05; 95% CI, 1.76-9.32; P = .001), and IL-6 (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.11-2.32; P < .001). The score showed excellent calibration (P > .05) and net clinical benefit (decision curve analysis curve). Reclassification analysis revealed significant improvements in risk stratification (net reclassification index, 0.366 in training; 0.206 in validation). The survival curves clearly demonstrated that the ACEF-TBAD score effectively stratified patients into distinct risk categories, which underscores the clinical utility of the ACEF-TBAD score in predicting severe adverse events and supports its use in risk assessment for patients with TBAD.
Conclusions: The ACEF-TBAD score is a novel and simple risk-stratification tool. This enables early identification of high-risk patients, facilitating personalized treatment and improving patient outcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.06.018 | DOI Listing |