98%
921
2 minutes
20
This review focuses on integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare, particularly for predicting adverse events, which holds potential in clinical decision support (CDS) but also presents significant challenges. Biases in data acquisition, such as population shifts and data scarcity, threaten the generalizability of AI-based CDS algorithms across different healthcare centers. Techniques like resampling and data augmentation are crucial for addressing biases, along with external validation to mitigate population bias. Moreover, biases can emerge during AI training, leading to underfitting or overfitting, necessitating regularization techniques for balancing model complexity and generalizability. The lack of interpretability in AI models poses trust and transparency issues, advocating for transparent algorithms and requiring rigorous testing on specific hospital populations before implementation. Additionally, emphasizing human judgment alongside AI integration is essential to mitigate the risks of deskilling healthcare practitioners. Ongoing evaluation processes and adjustments to regulatory frameworks are crucial for ensuring the ethical, safe, and effective use of AI in CDS, highlighting the need for meticulous attention to data quality, preprocessing, model training, interpretability, and ethical considerations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12162700 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1403047 | DOI Listing |
JMIR Hum Factors
September 2025
Seidenberg School of Computer Science and Information Systems, Pace University, New York City, NY, United States.
Background: As information and communication technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) become deeply integrated into daily life, the focus on users' digital well-being has grown across academic and industrial fields. However, fragmented perspectives and approaches to digital well-being in AI-powered systems hinder a holistic understanding, leaving researchers and practitioners struggling to design truly human-centered AI systems.
Objective: This paper aims to address the fragmentation by synthesizing diverse perspectives and approaches to digital well-being through a systematic literature review.
J Med Microbiol
September 2025
Alberta Precision Laboratories Public Health Lab, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
For thousands of years, parasitic infections have represented a constant challenge to human health. Despite constant progress in science and medicine, the challenge has remained mostly unchanged over the years, partly due to the vast complexity of the host-parasite-environment relationships. Over the last century, our approaches to these challenges have evolved through considerable advances in science and technology, offering new and better solutions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Surg
September 2025
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Affiliated Tai'an City Central Hospital of Qingdao University, Taian, China.
J Robot Surg
September 2025
Department of CSE, United Institute of Technology, Coimbatore, India.
Diabetologia
September 2025
Department of Diabetology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
This review article, developed by the EASD Global Council, addresses the growing global challenges in diabetes research and care, highlighting the rising prevalence of diabetes, the increasing complexity of its management and the need for a coordinated international response. With regard to research, disparities in funding and infrastructure between high-income countries and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are discussed. The under-representation of LMIC populations in clinical trials, challenges in conducting large-scale research projects, and the ethical and legal complexities of artificial intelligence integration are also considered as specific issues.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF