A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

The approach to placement of a continuous-flow intracorporeal ventricular assist device in small left ventricle. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: The HeartMate 3 (HM3) has become among the most widely utilized durable left ventricular (LV) assist devices (LVAD) owing to reduced rates of pump thrombosis, bleeding, and stroke. One limitation of the HM3 is its large size, which poses a challenge for implantation in smaller LVs. Herein, we describe a novel technique for durable LVAD implantation in patients with a small LV.

Methods: Patients who underwent durable LVAD implantation from January 2020 to August 2024 were included in this study. The modified technique involved excision of the mitral valve (MV) and associated apparatus to create room for the LVAD inflow. The primary outcome was mortality, and secondary outcomes included rates of postoperative complications and hemodynamic parameters. Patient follow-up was until September 2024.

Results: Eleven patients were included in this study. All patients received an HM3. The median preoperative LV end-diastolic diameter was 5.1 cm. The median total time on LVAD was 149 days, and overall mortality was 27.2% occurring a median of 204 days post-LVAD implantation. Four patients (36.4%) underwent heart transplantation and 4 (36.4%) were alive on LVAD at last follow-up. Proportions of morbidity included readmission for heart failure ( = 2, 18.2%), cerebrovascular accident ( = 2, 18.2%), and pump thrombosis ( = 0).

Conclusions: The small LV has been a significant challenge for durable LVAD insertion and is often considered a contraindication. A modified approach to LVAD insertion, including excision of the MV and associated apparatus and alignment of the LVAD inflow cannula with the MV orifice, allows for LVAD implantation in patients with a small LV.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142627PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100256DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

durable lvad
12
lvad implantation
12
implantation patients
12
lvad
10
ventricular assist
8
pump thrombosis
8
patients small
8
included study
8
associated apparatus
8
lvad inflow
8

Similar Publications