98%
921
2 minutes
20
Aims: The Burch-Schneider Reinforcement Ring (BSRR) was developed to manage significant acetabular defects and prevent protrusion in complex primary and revision total hip arthroplasties. This study evaluates the long-term performance of the BSRR over four decades, focusing on survival, patient-reported outcomes, radiological evidence of loosening, complication rates, and factors associated with implant failure.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 200 hips treated with the BSRR at the Cantonal Hospital of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland, from January 1974 to December 2018. Clinical and radiological data were reviewed, and patients were followed through clinical visits, questionnaires, and registry data. Outcomes were assessed using standardized scoring systems and radiological evaluations. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards modelling were used to identify factors associated with implant failure.
Results: The cumulative survival of the BSRR was 72% (95% CI 50 to 100) at 20 years with any clinical or radiological failure as the endpoint, and 97% (95% CI 95 to 100) at 20 years for revision of the BSRR specifically. Clinical outcomes showed moderate improvements at final-follow-up, with a mean Harris Hip Score of 53.4 (SD 25.3) and a Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score of 72.8 (SD 18.6). Radiologically at final follow-up, the BSRR demonstrated good stability, with 1.5% of cases (n = 2) showing probable loosening and low rates of osteolysis (3% acetabular (n = 4) and 14% femoral (n = 18)). The primary predictor of implant failure was the Paprosky Grade IV acetabular defect, with a hazard ratio of 4.4 (95% CI 1.2 to 15.7).
Conclusion: The BSRR remains an effective solution for acetabular revision surgery, providing consistent long-term outcomes. Its durability makes it a valuable tool in orthopaedic surgery, especially when managing significant bone loss.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B6.BJJ-2024-1106.R1 | DOI Listing |
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
July 2025
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France.
Purpose: During revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), severe acetabular bone defects are usually treated with bone allograft combined with a metal cage or ring. The purpose of this study was to assess clinical and radiological outcomes after acetabular reconstruction with supercritical CO (Supercrit®) bone allografts.
Methods: Patients treated for acetabular reconstruction with Supercrit® allograft at [redacted] between 2005 and 2010 were included in this retrospective study.
Cureus
June 2025
Orthopedic Surgery, Nishinomiya Kaisei Hospital, Nishinomiya, JPN.
Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) in the elderly have been on the rise. Conventional treatment options have often been conservative. However, in recent years, osteosynthesis has been recommended in order to achieve early ambulation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Med
June 2025
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 30-663 Krakow, Poland.
In recent years, a significant increase in the incidence of both total hip arthroplasty and acetabular revision surgery has been observed. A substantial proportion of patients requiring these revision procedures present with major bone deficits and extensive osteolysis. In light of these challenges, this study aims to provide a comprehensive comparison between two commonly utilized methods: trabecular titanium shell implants and Burch-Schneider acetabular reinforcement cages.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBone Joint J
June 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, HFR Fribourg Hospital, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Aims: The Burch-Schneider Reinforcement Ring (BSRR) was developed to manage significant acetabular defects and prevent protrusion in complex primary and revision total hip arthroplasties. This study evaluates the long-term performance of the BSRR over four decades, focusing on survival, patient-reported outcomes, radiological evidence of loosening, complication rates, and factors associated with implant failure.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 200 hips treated with the BSRR at the Cantonal Hospital of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland, from January 1974 to December 2018.
J Pers Med
March 2023
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Saarland, Kirrberger Straße, 66421 Homburg, Germany.
Introduction: Revision hip arthroplasty is a challenging surgical procedure, especially in cases of advanced acetabular bone loss. Accurate preoperative planning can prevent complications such as periprosthetic fractures or aseptic loosening. To date, the accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) templating has been evaluated only in primary hip and knee arthroplasty.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF