A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Integrating metabolomics and transcriptomics to analyze differences in muscle mass and flavor formation in and yellow cattle. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Beef flavor is affected by muscle metabolites and their related regulatory genes, and the molecular regulatory mechanisms vary among different beef breeds. To provide some new ways to improve meat quality and cattle breed improvement, 24-month-old ( = 8) and yellow cattle ( = 8) were selected for comparison in this study. The result revealed that the longissimus dorsi muscle fiber diameter, protein content and a-value of were significantly higher than that of yellow cattle, but the fat content was lower than that of yellow cattle. Furthermore, meat contained notably higher levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and n-3PUFA than that of yellow cattle, and also had better levels of flavor amino acids (FAAs) and sweet amino acids (SAAs), which contribute to the flavor of beef. Through comprehensive analysis of transcriptomics and metabolomics, we detected a total of 109 markedly different metabolites (DEMs) and 1,677 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the pectoral muscles of the two breeds. Further analysis indicated that amino acid and lipid metabolism might be the key factors contributing to the differences in meat quality and flavor between and yellow cattle, involving metabolites such as L-2-aminobutyric acid, L-glutamic acid, L-glutamine, L-serine, betaine, pantothenic acid, and taurine. Through correlation analysis, we identified genes highly associated with flavor amino acids (, ), muscle development (, , ), and lipid metabolism (, , , , , 3, , , ) related essential regulatory genes and constructed a gene-metabolite interaction network for meat quality and flavor formation in . In summary, it was shown that significant differences in muscle metabolites between and yellow cattle, especially in amino acid and lipid metabolism, may be the major reason for the differences in quality and flavor between the two types of beef. This study provides a theoretical basis for further exploring the molecular regulatory mechanisms of the differences in beef quality and flavor between and yellow cattle, and provides a reference for the development and genetic breeding of high-quality cattle breeds.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12116499PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1581767DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

yellow cattle
32
quality flavor
16
meat quality
12
amino acids
12
lipid metabolism
12
cattle
10
flavor
9
differences muscle
8
flavor formation
8
yellow
8

Similar Publications