Effect of leadless left ventricular endocardial and left bundle branch area pacing on biventricular repolarization metrics.

Heart Rhythm

Department of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Published: May 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) delivered with left ventricular (LV) epicardial pacing may increase arrhythmic risk through detrimental effects on ventricular repolarization. Leadless LV endocardial CRT including leadless left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) may mitigate this by preserving a more physiological transmural activation pattern.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of leadless LV endocardial and leadless LBBAP on repolarization metrics derived from electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi).

Methods: Ten patients with leadless endocardial CRT systems underwent a temporary pacing plus ECGi study, testing right ventricular, LV, and biventricular pacing (BiVP) settings, as well as atrioventricular-optimized LV pacing. Epicardial electrograms were used to derive metrics of repolarization and activation-recovery interval dispersion. The primary outcome measurements were acute improvement (ie, reduction) from baseline (right ventricular pacing or underlying rhythm) of these repolarization metrics.

Results: Ten patients were studied; 5 had received LV lateral wall endocardial pacing, and 5 had received LBBAP with leadless septal wall pacing. The optimal leadless pacing setting significantly improved biventricular dispersion of repolarization by 23.7% ± 14% (P < .01), and this effect was more pronounced with LBBAP (29.3% ± 15%, P = .01) vs lateral wall pacing (18% ± 12%, P = .03). Similar results were observed for activation-recovery interval dispersion and biventricular repolarization gradients. The most pronounced improvements were observed where LV-only pacing as opposed to BiVP was used, either through LBBAP or atrioventricular-optimized LV pacing from any endocardial location.

Conclusion: Optimized leadless LV endocardial lateral wall pacing and LBBAP improve ECGi-derived ventricular repolarization metrics. LV-only pacing seemed superior to endocardial BiVP, potentially reflecting repolarization heterogeneity caused by a collision of 2 paced wavefronts.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2025.05.047DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

leadless endocardial
16
pacing
15
repolarization metrics
12
lateral wall
12
wall pacing
12
leadless
9
repolarization
9
leadless left
8
left ventricular
8
endocardial
8

Similar Publications

Leadless ultrasound-based LV endocardial pacing for CRT: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMC Cardiovasc Disord

July 2025

Department of Ultrasound, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Shandong University, No. 11 Wuyingshan Middle Road, Tianqiao District, Jinan, Shandong Province, 250031, China.

Background: The purpose of the study was to appraise and compare cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) employing leadless left ventricular endocardial pacing (LVEP) with an ultrasound transmitter.

Methods: The meta-analysis employed continuous random or fixed effect models to get mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 6 papers with a total of 272 subjects, available between 2014 and 2022, were included in this meta-analysis from a search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, OVID, and Embase databases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Effect of leadless left ventricular endocardial and left bundle branch area pacing on biventricular repolarization metrics.

Heart Rhythm

May 2025

Department of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) delivered with left ventricular (LV) epicardial pacing may increase arrhythmic risk through detrimental effects on ventricular repolarization. Leadless LV endocardial CRT including leadless left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) may mitigate this by preserving a more physiological transmural activation pattern.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of leadless LV endocardial and leadless LBBAP on repolarization metrics derived from electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cardiac pacing using long leads has inherent complications of adhesions, fractures and infection. Current leadless pacemakers include battery-operated devices that are relatively large in size. We present here the initial design and animal experiments with a new ultrathin leadless device, activated by subcutaneous application of short trains of high frequency (250 kHz) alternating electrical fields (HFAF).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves outcomes but faces challenges such as unsuccessful lead placement and suboptimal responses. The Wireless Stimulation Endocardially for CRT (WiSE-CRT) system, a novel leadless left ventricular (LV) pacing technology, uses ultrasonic energy to deliver electrical stimulation directly to the LV endocardium, potentially improving the response rates.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The WiSE cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) system (EBR Systems Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) is an innovative technique consisting of an electrode implanted in the endocardium of the left ventricle as an alternative to the conventional CRT for symptomatic patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (EF) despite optimal medical treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Wise CRT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF