A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Assessing the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in identifying early rectal cancers suitable for endoscopic intermuscular dissection. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Selection of rectal cancers suitable for endoscopic intermuscular dissection (EID) is challenging. We aimed to evaluate whether identification of ≥1 mm of preserved muscularis propria on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), using a systematic reporting tool (mrSRT), can identify rectal cancers suitable for EID.An expert radiologist trained 12 study radiologists in the use of the mrSRT. The radiologists then assessed a retrospective series of MRIs from 269 consecutive patients with suspected deep submucosal invasive rectal cancer. The primary objective was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of ≥1 mm of preserved muscularis propria on MRI for selecting cases that can be resected with clear margins using EID (invasion limited to the circular muscularis propria [≤pT2circ]). Diagnostic accuracy was calculated for the expert radiologist, study radiologists, and a consensus diagnosis.After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 244 patient scans were included in the analysis. Histological classification confirmed 18 lesions (7.4%) were noninvasive, 109 (44.7%) were pT1, 56 (23.0%) were pT2circ, 21 (8.6%) were pT2long, 39 (16.0%) were pT3, and 1 (0.4%) was pT4. The overall diagnostic accuracy of ≥1 mm of preserved muscularis propria as a criterion for selection was 80.7% (95%CI 75.2-85.5) for the expert radiologist, 77.5% (95%CI 71.7-82.5) for the trained study radiologists, and 81.6% (95%CI 76.1-86.2) for a consensus diagnosis.Use of mrSRT to identify ≥1 mm of preserved muscularis propria on MRI allowed radiologists to assist in appropriate case selection for EID.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2621-2515DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

muscularis propria
20
≥1 preserved
16
preserved muscularis
16
rectal cancers
12
cancers suitable
12
expert radiologist
12
study radiologists
12
diagnostic accuracy
12
magnetic resonance
8
resonance imaging
8

Similar Publications