98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objectives: Although computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) has increased significantly the precision of dental implant placement, documentation of the impact of such technologies in the patient-reported experience and outcomes remains, however, limited. The aim of this white paper was to assess the impact of CAIS on key aspects of the patient experience, such as its potential benefits on (1) patients' understanding and engagement with implant surgery, (2) patient's confidence with treatment outcomes, (3) patients' preferences, (4) intra- and (5) Postoperative experience and (6) long-term patient-reported outcomes and oral health-related quality of life.
Material And Methods: A review of the literature compiled existing evidence from clinical studies up to November 2024, which was later discussed and synthesized with expert opinions and the best currently documented experience and practice.
Results: No evidence was found that CAIS improves patient engagement or confidence with treatment outcomes, while comparative studies showed no difference in the intra- and postoperative experience when CAIS is used. Impact of the cost of CAIS procedures on patients perceptions and preferences has also not been explored, with the majority of studies significantly subsidizing patient costs, in particular randomized trials. At the same time, studies that compare interventions cannot assess the overall benefits of a complex workflow such as immediacy or minimally invasive approaches, to which CAIS is an essential part.
Conclusions: Research on patient outcomes with CAIS might not fully reflect the potential of these technologies when limited to the level of the surgical intervention. Major anticipated benefits of CAIS for the patient such as the potential to reduce complexity and facilitate faster, safer and more predictable execution of digitally designed treatments, could be better approached in the future by studies aimed at assessing patient-reported outcomes from entire treatment workflows.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12104987 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.70143 | DOI Listing |
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
September 2025
Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Introduction: Iatrogenic lead perforation is a rare but serious complication of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Evidence on percutaneous management of subacute or delayed cases remains limited.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 38 patients treated for iatrogenic lead perforation between January 2012 and October 2024.
Aesthetic Plast Surg
September 2025
Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Acta Ortop Mex
September 2025
Servicio de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Hospital de San Rafael, Hospitales Pascual. Cádiz, España.
Introduction: anatomical deformities such as developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and Perthes disease represent a challenge for reconstruction. The use of 3D-printed models can be helpful for assessing the deformity, bone mass, implant size, and orientation.
Objectives: to prospectively evaluate the outcomes of 3D simulation in primary total hip arthroplasty.
Acta Ortop Mex
September 2025
Departamento de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Unidad de Cirugía de Rodilla, Hospital Clínico San Carlos. Madrid, España.
Introduction: the progressive increase in the volume of primary knee arthroplasty surgery is leading in parallel to an increase in revision surgeries, and this trend is expected to continue in the coming decades.
Material And Methods: a retrospective observational study with 203 interventions in 201 patients with knee arthroplasty revision surgery at our center between 2018-2022, including the variables age, sex, body mass index, primary implant, time until revision surgery, mechanical alignment of the primary implant, cause of revision, revision implant, and need for secondary revision.
Results: the average age of the patients was 73.
Acta Ortop Mex
September 2025
Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación «Dr. Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra». Ciudad de México. México.
Introduction: the presence of implants that occupy the femoral canal is frequent in patients undergoing ipsilateral total knee replacement (TKR). The use of electronic alignment and robotic assistance make intramedullary alignment unnecessary and could be adequate in situations with an occupied femoral canal (OFC).
Material And Methods: we present a prospective cohort of 25 patients who underwent robotic alignment TKR and had prior ipsilateral surgery in the femur that resulted in occupied femoral canal.