98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background And Aims: Current international guidelines recommend a center volume of at least 20 minimally invasive pancreatic procedures a year to perform laparoscopic left pancreatectomy. Iceland is a small, isolated country that is unavoidably low volume in terms of pancreatic surgery. To ensure good quality of care, there is a long tradition of surgeons training abroad, but this system has not been formally evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic and open left pancreatectomy over the last 20 years in Iceland.
Methods: This was a national retrospective cohort study including all patients who underwent left-sided pancreatic resection in Iceland from 2003 to 2022.
Results: A total of 244 patients underwent a pancreatic procedure during the study period. Eighty of these underwent left-sided resections, 41 of whom had a laparoscopic left pancreatectomy (LLP). Resection rates increased over the study period, and a significantly larger proportion of patients underwent LLP in the latter half of the study period. The laparoscopy group had statistically significantly lower rates of splenectomy (<0.001) and blood loss (<0.001) compared with open surgery. The morbidity rate of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade IIIa or higher) was 23%. The in-hospital and 90-day mortality rates were 1% and 4%, respectively.
Conclusions: Overall, the operative and postoperative outcomes of left-sided pancreatic resections in a low-volume setting in Iceland were comparable to current reported studies from other Western countries.
Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT06738914.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14574969251343471 | DOI Listing |
Surgery
September 2025
Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. Electronic address:
Objective: To validate the Mayo Clinic classification for predicting gastric preservation in pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection, identify key technical factors, and show that, after the learning curve, gastric preservation is feasible even in high-risk cases when specific vascular preservation or reconstruction techniques are applied.
Background: Neoadjuvant therapy has made locally advanced pancreatic tumors resectable, but vascular invasion poses technical challenges, especially for preserving the stomach during pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection.
Methods: Retrospective review of a single-center prospective database.
Cureus
July 2025
Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, GBR.
Pancreatectomy remains the gold standard treatment for pancreatic malignancies but is frequently complicated by delayed gastric emptying (DGE) and gastric venous congestion (GVC). Disruption of the left gastric vein (LGV) has been increasingly implicated in these postoperative complications. We conducted a systematic review, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, to assess the impact of LGV preservation on post-operative complications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWorld J Methodol
September 2025
Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna 801507, Bihar, India.
Background: Historically intraoperative drains were employed after pancreatic surgery but over the last decade, there has been debate over the routine usage of drains.
Aim: To assess the necessity of intra-abdominal drain placement, identify the most effective drain type, and determine the optimal timing for drain removal.
Methods: A systematic review of electronic databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, PubMed Central, and Google Scholar, was conducted using Medical Subject Headings and keywords until December 2023.
Cancers (Basel)
August 2025
Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, University of Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
: SIMPLR-2 is a follow-up to the international, multicenter SIMPLR-1 study evaluating long-term oncological outcomes after open (OLP), laparoscopic (LLP), and robotic (RLP) left pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). : A retrospective analysis of 71 PDAC patients from three high-volume centers was performed. Surgical approaches were stratified into open, laparoscopic, and robotic.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSurg Endosc
August 2025
Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
Background: The standard technique in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) has not yet been established. While the left renal vein (LRV) is a critical anatomical landmark for defining the posterior surgical margin, safe and reliable approaches to access the LRV have not been thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to evaluate whether the perinephric vein could serve as a landmark to guide access to the LRV and assist in determining the posterior surgical margin.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF