A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Stomach preservation in pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection: Prediction and technique via Mayo Clinic classification. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objective: To validate the Mayo Clinic classification for predicting gastric preservation in pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection, identify key technical factors, and show that, after the learning curve, gastric preservation is feasible even in high-risk cases when specific vascular preservation or reconstruction techniques are applied.

Background: Neoadjuvant therapy has made locally advanced pancreatic tumors resectable, but vascular invasion poses technical challenges, especially for preserving the stomach during pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection.

Methods: Retrospective review of a single-center prospective database.

Results: Among 236 pancreatectomies with arterial resection, 81 were pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (32 distal, 39.5%; 49 total, 60.5%). The celiac axis was resected alone in 31 patients (38%) or with other vessels (62%). Gastrectomy was required in 23 patients (28.4%) because of tumor adherence (13.6%) or gastric ischemia (14.8%). Severe complications occurred in 16 patients (19.8%), with 5 deaths (6.3%) reported. After excluding 11 oncologic gastrectomies, 70 patients were eligible for analysis; 34 (48.6%) were high risk. Gastrectomy occurred in 12 patients (17.1%), more frequently in high- compared with low-risk cases (26.5% vs 8%; P = .0594). The learning curve was completed after 27 procedures. Before this threshold, gastric preservation rates were greater in low-risk patients (84.2%) than high-risk ones (25.0%) (P = .0061). After learning curve, the difference was not significant (100% vs 88.5%). Independent predictors of gastric preservation included preserved/reconstructed arteries (odds ratio, 14.09; P = .0058) and preservation or reconstruction of the left gastric vein (odds ratio, 36.38, P = .0083).

Conclusion: The Mayo Clinic classification accurately predicts gastric preservation feasibility in the absence of vascular-preservation strategies. After learning curve, gastric preservation can be achieved even in high-risk patients through targeted vascular preservation or reconstruction.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2025.109606DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gastric preservation
24
celiac axis
20
pancreatectomy celiac
16
learning curve
16
axis resection
12
mayo clinic
12
clinic classification
12
preservation reconstruction
12
preservation
9
preservation pancreatectomy
8

Similar Publications