98%
921
2 minutes
20
Biologic therapies have revolutionized the management of severe asthma (SA), offering significant symptom control and reduced exacerbations for many patients. However, up to 25% of individuals do not show satisfactory responses to these treatments and are categorized as non-responders. Definitions of response and primary non-response to biologics in SA are well-established. In secondary nonresponse, patients show initial response to biological treatment in the first 6-12 months but later lose asthma control, and in SA this phenomenon remains undefined and unstudied in literature. We present 4 cases of severe asthma treated with different biologic agents. All patients demonstrated significant clinical improvement during the first 12 months of therapy but followed by a gradual loss of asthma control, indicative of secondary nonresponse. We discuss the clinical features, potential mechanisms, and implications of secondary nonresponse to biologics in severe asthma, highlighting an unmet need for further research to define this phenomenon and guide future therapeutic strategies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12101457 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S517784 | DOI Listing |
Radiat Environ Biophys
September 2025
Environmental Physics Department, Institute for Energy Security and Environmental Safety, HUN-REN Centre for Energy Research, Budapest, Hungary.
Variability in radiation-related health risk and genetic susceptibility to radiation effects within a population is a key issue for radiation protection. Besides differences in the health and biological effects of the same radiation dose, individual variability may also affect dose distribution and its consequences for the same exposure. As exposure to radon progeny affects a large population and has a well-established dose-effect relationship, investigating individual variability upon radon exposure may be particularly important.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEquine Vet J
September 2025
Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada.
Background: Steaming hay reduces respirable particles and is commonly used to feed horses with asthma. However, it showed inconsistent benefits in clinical studies.
Objectives: (1) To assess the effects of steamed hay on lung function and airway inflammation in horses with severe equine asthma (SEA) in remission; (2) To compare these effects with a dry hay diet.
Respirology
September 2025
Department of Pharmacy, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, National Yang, Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Background And Objective: Women with asthma should continue controller therapy during pregnancy, but current evidence on the effects of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) on adverse fetal outcomes remains unclear.
Methods: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study. Data were derived from the Health and Welfare Database, Birth Certificate Application, and Maternal and Child Health Database in Taiwan, from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2018.
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis
July 2025
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi.
Ladakh is a hilly Himalayan dry desert, situated at an altitude of >11,000 feet. Studies have demonstrated that the spirometric values of high-altitude residents are significantly higher than those of low landers. This is a retrospective observational study that analyzes the spirometry pattern in chronic lung diseases among people from Ladakh.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ Public Health
September 2025
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Background: To synthesise recent empirical evidence for the prevention and management of respiratory function in children.
Methods And Findings: We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science databases for studies published from inception to 16 September 2024. Two authors independently selected eligible studies, evaluated the quality of the included studies and assessed bias based on the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing the risk of bias.