A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Testing certain and uncertain incentives on study retention in a longitudinal social media survey among young adults: An embedded recruitment trial. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Introduction: Incentives can be effective in survey research but evidence is limited on how incentive type impacts survey retention in longitudinal social media-based surveys. This study examined how certain and uncertain incentives affect study retention among US young adults recruited online and whether incentive effects vary by sociodemographic factors.

Methods: Participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to a three-arm parallel trial ( = 1615) with (1) a lottery for a $200 gift card (uncertain), (2) a cash equivalent (CE) of a $5 gift card per survey (certain); or (3) a combination of both options (combined), and were surveyed at baseline, 30 days, and 60 days. This study focused on survey retention at 30 days (among baseline completers,  = 1491) and 60 days (among 30-day completers,  = 1018). Participants were not blinded to their condition but were blinded to other conditions and researchers were blinded until data collection was complete. Logistic regressions examined survey retention as a function of incentive condition and sociodemographics, with additional analyses of interaction effects. We report average marginal effects (AMEs) with significance defined as  < 0.05.

Results: The certain CE was effective for survey retention versus the lottery at 30-day follow-up only (43.8% [lottery] vs. 77.7% [CE], AME: 0.346,  < 0.000); there were no differences between CE versus lottery at 60-day follow-up (76.1% [lottery] and 81.3% [CE], AME: 0.054,  = 0.192). The combined incentive demonstrated significantly higher retention at both follow-ups versus the lottery but no significant advantage over the CE. Incentive effectiveness showed minimal variation across sociodemographic factors.

Discussion: This study is among the few to experimentally test incentives for retention in online social-media based research. A certain CE was most effective for short-term web survey retention among young adults compared with a lottery. Findings suggest that small guaranteed rewards may better motivate study retention than uncertain larger amounts.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12099130PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076251336522DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

survey retention
12
uncertain incentives
8
study retention
8
retention longitudinal
8
longitudinal social
8
young adults
8
gift card
8
survey
6
retention
5
testing uncertain
4

Similar Publications