Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Introduction: Incentives can be effective in survey research but evidence is limited on how incentive type impacts survey retention in longitudinal social media-based surveys. This study examined how certain and uncertain incentives affect study retention among US young adults recruited online and whether incentive effects vary by sociodemographic factors.
Methods: Participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to a three-arm parallel trial ( = 1615) with (1) a lottery for a $200 gift card (uncertain), (2) a cash equivalent (CE) of a $5 gift card per survey (certain); or (3) a combination of both options (combined), and were surveyed at baseline, 30 days, and 60 days. This study focused on survey retention at 30 days (among baseline completers, = 1491) and 60 days (among 30-day completers, = 1018). Participants were not blinded to their condition but were blinded to other conditions and researchers were blinded until data collection was complete. Logistic regressions examined survey retention as a function of incentive condition and sociodemographics, with additional analyses of interaction effects. We report average marginal effects (AMEs) with significance defined as < 0.05.
Results: The certain CE was effective for survey retention versus the lottery at 30-day follow-up only (43.8% [lottery] vs. 77.7% [CE], AME: 0.346, < 0.000); there were no differences between CE versus lottery at 60-day follow-up (76.1% [lottery] and 81.3% [CE], AME: 0.054, = 0.192). The combined incentive demonstrated significantly higher retention at both follow-ups versus the lottery but no significant advantage over the CE. Incentive effectiveness showed minimal variation across sociodemographic factors.
Discussion: This study is among the few to experimentally test incentives for retention in online social-media based research. A certain CE was most effective for short-term web survey retention among young adults compared with a lottery. Findings suggest that small guaranteed rewards may better motivate study retention than uncertain larger amounts.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12099130 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20552076251336522 | DOI Listing |