98%
921
2 minutes
20
Barrett's esophagus is the precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Esophageal adenocarcinoma detected from endoscopic surveillance programs accounts for <10% of all cases, suggesting majority of patients with Barrett's esophagus are likely unaccounted for. Previous observational studies have estimated the observed prevalence of Barrett's esophagus to be approximately 1%, but others suggest may be an underestimate. The aim of this study was twofold: (i) calculate lifetime risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma and (ii) estimate overall and age-specific prevalence of Barrett's esophagus. A tree cohort model was created for progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma from birth to death (100 years) for USA and Australian population. Lifetime risk of esophageal cancer and adenocarcinoma were necessary for calculating Barrett's esophagus prevalence. The model incorporated age- and sex-specific incidence data from national cancer registries: the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for the USA. The model was calibrated using an optimization algorithm, which matched progression rates from Barrett's esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma with known national cancer data. A Monte Carlo simulation, with 10,000 iterations, was conducted to derive error margins. Estimates of age-specific and overall prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in the population were generated through a similar process. Results: The lifetime risk of esophageal cancer and adenocarcinoma in USA non-Hispanic White population was 0.56% and 0.36%, respectively, while it was somewhat higher at 0.81% and 0.61% (range 0.57%-0.65%) in the Australian population. Estimated overall prevalence of Barrett's esophagus was ~3% (±0.3%) and ~ 5.4% (±0.6%) in USA White and Australian populations (male and female). Prevalence for age brackets was estimated at 0.06% (±0.02%), 1.6% (±0.7%), 3.2% (±1.3%), 8% (±3%), and 12% (±4%) for USA, and 0.05% (±0.02%), 0.9% (±0.5%), 2.8% (±1.2%), 7% (±3%), and 12% (±4%) for Australian population for ages 0-29, 30-44, 45-59, 60-74, and 75+, respectively. Observed estimates of Barrett's esophagus prevalence are likely lower than projected overall prevalence. This study also presents age-specific prevalence estimates of Barrett's esophagus, which are key in developing screening programs for esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12085195 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/dote/doaf038 | DOI Listing |
Gastro Hep Adv
June 2025
Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Background And Aims: Risk prediction models can identify individuals at high risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. This systematic review aimed to critically appraise the available models for projecting absolute risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma in the general population.
Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for studies of risk prediction models for esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Medicine (Baltimore)
August 2025
Department of Pathology, Affiliated Hospital 2 of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Background: The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) has significantly increased in developed Western countries. Despite medical advancements, the prognosis remains poor, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 20%. By 2024, the global incidence is expected to reach 141,300 new cases annually, underscoring the urgent need to elucidate the mechanisms underlying EA pathogenesis to develop effective preventive and therapeutic strategies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)
June 2025
Division of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Current screening methods for Barrett esophagus (BE), the precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), are inadequate with less than one-third of screen-eligible patients currently undergoing screening. In addition to low screening rates, key issues include overemphasis on gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and lack of provider awareness, owing in part to heterogeneous guidelines. To address these challenges, several new approaches are being explored: swallowable cell collection devices, exhaled volatile organic compounds analysis, blood-based molecular biomarkers, microbiome analysis, and alternative visualization methods such as transnasal and capsule endos-copy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Oncol
August 2025
Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising biomarker for the early detection of esophageal cancer (EC), offering a minimally invasive means to assess tumor-derived genomic and epigenomic alterations. This review synthesizes current data on ctDNA biology, detection technologies, diagnostic performance, and clinical applicability in both esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. We conducted a comprehensive literature review of PubMed-indexed studies on ctDNA in EC, emphasizing recent (January 1, 2019- December 31, 2024) findings, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
July 2025
Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Joy McCann Culverhouse Center for Swallowing Disorders, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, USA.
Achalasia is a disorder of unknown etiology that disrupts esophageal motility and esophagogastric junction outflow. Many long-term complications are associated with achalasia, including progression to megaesophagus and an increased risk for esophageal cancer. While current guidelines recommend against routine screening for cancer in patients with achalasia, many experts believe that routine endoscopic or radiographic screening at a yet-to-be-determined interval could provide essential data beyond evaluating for cancer.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF