98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Characteristics of patients significantly differ between registrational clinical trials (CTs) and Italian real-world practice, with older median age, higher elderly (≥ 65) rate and worse performance status (PS) in the latter, without imbalance in female rate. We compared the same characteristics between registrational phase 2/3 and phase 1 CTs.
Methods: Data on age, sex and PS were extracted from European Public Assessment Reports of European Medicines Agency. Weighted means and standard deviations were calculated in both groups and differences were described overall, by cancer type and drug class.
Results: We collected 103 phase 2/3 and 111 phase 1 CTs, supporting 97 therapeutic indications. Age and sex were compared in 59 indications. Mean median age (SD) was 60.7 (5.1) years in phase 2/3 and 59.7 (5.6) years in phase 1 (p = 0.051). Age difference was greater for skin and breast cancer; no heterogeneity emerged among drug classes. Mean female rate was not statistically significantly lower in phase 2/3 than phase 1 CTs overall, (mean difference - 4.9%, p = 0.999); difference was greater for skin and upper-gastrointestinal cancers and for cytotoxic agents. Mean PS > 1 rate, compared in 47 indications, was similar in phase 2/3 [2.3% (4.7)] and phase 1 [1.8% (3.5)] (p = 0.374); difference was greater for colorectal cancer and cytotoxic agents.
Conclusions: We found no statistically significant difference in age, sex and PS between patients in phase 2/3 and corresponding phase 1 CTs for anticancer treatments. Therefore, patient selection in phase 1 trials appears crucial, considering its potential impact in later development phases.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083001 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-025-06509-z | DOI Listing |
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces
September 2025
Research Center for Nano-Biomaterial, Analytical and Testing Center, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China.
Regeneration of infected bone defects (IBDs) requires biomaterials capable of dynamically coordinating antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and osteogenic functions. Overcoming the spatiotemporal mismatches in treating IBDs remains a critical challenge. Here, we designed a temporally controlled therapy based on gelatin methacrylate (GelMA)-based nanocomposite hydrogels (GCS) coembedded with sulfur quantum dots (SQDs) nanoenzymes and calcium-phosphorus oligomers (CPOs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Orthop Sci
September 2025
Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan.
Background: The concept of early-phase diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (EDISH) was recently introduced and its prevalence at the thoracic spine level was revealed. Some cases of EDISH progress to diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) in association with being overweight. The prevalence and distribution of EDISH in the whole spine and related factors are unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRespir Med
September 2025
Scottish Centre for Respiratory Research, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom. Electronic address:
Background: Eosinophilic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (eCOPD), characterized by type 2 inflammation, is an emerging target for biologic therapies.
Objective: To indirectly compare the efficacy of dupilumab and mepolizumab in eCOPD, defined as blood eosinophil counts ≥300 cells/μL, by synthesizing data from phase 3 randomized controlled trials: BOREAS and NOTUS for dupilumab, MATINEE for mepolizumab.
Methods: We performed an indirect comparison of trial primary and secondary outcomes including annual exacerbation rates (AER), quality of life (St.
Stat Med
September 2025
Biostatistics and Data Management, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, New York, USA.
Typical phase 1 oncology studies identify the maximum tolerated dose as the "optimal" dose for subsequent phases. With the advancement of molecular targeted agents and immunotherapies, however, evaluating two or more doses has become increasingly critical for dose selection. Such evaluation is often done in phase 2 studies in a randomized manner.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLancet Oncol
September 2025
British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Background: The role of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remains unclear. Prostate Cancer Study 9 (PCS-9) aimed to evaluate the benefits of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in addition to standard systemic therapy in patients with oligometastatic CRPC.
Methods: This open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial was conducted across 13 Canadian academic and community oncology centres.