Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Characteristics of patients significantly differ between registrational clinical trials (CTs) and Italian real-world practice, with older median age, higher elderly (≥ 65) rate and worse performance status (PS) in the latter, without imbalance in female rate. We compared the same characteristics between registrational phase 2/3 and phase 1 CTs.

Methods: Data on age, sex and PS were extracted from European Public Assessment Reports of European Medicines Agency. Weighted means and standard deviations were calculated in both groups and differences were described overall, by cancer type and drug class.

Results: We collected 103 phase 2/3 and 111 phase 1 CTs, supporting 97 therapeutic indications. Age and sex were compared in 59 indications. Mean median age (SD) was 60.7 (5.1) years in phase 2/3 and 59.7 (5.6) years in phase 1 (p = 0.051). Age difference was greater for skin and breast cancer; no heterogeneity emerged among drug classes. Mean female rate was not statistically significantly lower in phase 2/3 than phase 1 CTs overall, (mean difference - 4.9%, p = 0.999); difference was greater for skin and upper-gastrointestinal cancers and for cytotoxic agents. Mean PS > 1 rate, compared in 47 indications, was similar in phase 2/3 [2.3% (4.7)] and phase 1 [1.8% (3.5)] (p = 0.374); difference was greater for colorectal cancer and cytotoxic agents.

Conclusions: We found no statistically significant difference in age, sex and PS between patients in phase 2/3 and corresponding phase 1 CTs for anticancer treatments. Therefore, patient selection in phase 1 trials appears crucial, considering its potential impact in later development phases.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12083001PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-025-06509-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

phase 2/3
28
phase
15
age sex
12
phase cts
12
difference greater
12
clinical trials
8
anticancer treatments
8
median age
8
female rate
8
rate compared
8

Similar Publications

Regeneration of infected bone defects (IBDs) requires biomaterials capable of dynamically coordinating antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and osteogenic functions. Overcoming the spatiotemporal mismatches in treating IBDs remains a critical challenge. Here, we designed a temporally controlled therapy based on gelatin methacrylate (GelMA)-based nanocomposite hydrogels (GCS) coembedded with sulfur quantum dots (SQDs) nanoenzymes and calcium-phosphorus oligomers (CPOs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The concept of early-phase diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (EDISH) was recently introduced and its prevalence at the thoracic spine level was revealed. Some cases of EDISH progress to diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) in association with being overweight. The prevalence and distribution of EDISH in the whole spine and related factors are unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Efficacy of dupilumab and mepolizumab in eosinophilic COPD: insights from phase 3 trials.

Respir Med

September 2025

Scottish Centre for Respiratory Research, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom. Electronic address:

Background: Eosinophilic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (eCOPD), characterized by type 2 inflammation, is an emerging target for biologic therapies.

Objective: To indirectly compare the efficacy of dupilumab and mepolizumab in eCOPD, defined as blood eosinophil counts ≥300 cells/μL, by synthesizing data from phase 3 randomized controlled trials: BOREAS and NOTUS for dupilumab, MATINEE for mepolizumab.

Methods: We performed an indirect comparison of trial primary and secondary outcomes including annual exacerbation rates (AER), quality of life (St.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Multiplicity Control in Oncology Clinical Trials With a Binary Surrogate Endpoint-Based Drop-The-Losers Design.

Stat Med

September 2025

Biostatistics and Data Management, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, New York, USA.

Typical phase 1 oncology studies identify the maximum tolerated dose as the "optimal" dose for subsequent phases. With the advancement of molecular targeted agents and immunotherapies, however, evaluating two or more doses has become increasingly critical for dose selection. Such evaluation is often done in phase 2 studies in a randomized manner.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The role of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remains unclear. Prostate Cancer Study 9 (PCS-9) aimed to evaluate the benefits of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in addition to standard systemic therapy in patients with oligometastatic CRPC.

Methods: This open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial was conducted across 13 Canadian academic and community oncology centres.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF