A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Automated vertebral identification and localization for enhanced radiotherapy patient setup. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background And Purpose: Vertebral bodies are critical landmarks for image-based patient positioning during radiotherapy (RT). However, manual identification of vertebral bodies can be laborious and a source of error, potentially leading to treatment mistakes. This study demonstrated an automated technique for vertebral identification and localization in images with varying quality and field of view (FOV), aiming to streamline the positioning process and minimize the risk of patient misalignment.

Materials And Methods: This retrospective study employed an nnU-Net-based model for automated vertebral identification and localization. Training was performed on 1,053 datasets (993 public datasets: SpineWeb, Verse19, Verse20, Spine1K; 60 clinical on-board CT scans from Infinity® and TomoTherapy®). Testing included 688 public datasets, 155 clinical on-board CT scans (Ethos®, Infinity®, TomoTherapy®, TrueBeam®, Trilogy®), and 50 clinical planning CTs (Brilliance CT Big-Bore-Oncology®). A strategic four-step post-processing procedure was developed to enhance accuracy, considering the anatomical characteristics of vertebral structures and vertebral abnormalities. Evaluation metrics included identification rates, mean localization errors, and their standard deviations.

Results: The method achieved high identification rates of 97.99 % with a mean localization error of 1.64 ± 1.23 mm on public datasets and 99.76 % with a mean error of 1.74 ± 1.36 mm on clinical datasets. Refining traditional 20 mm accuracy thresholds, new section-specific thresholds were established 10 mm for cervical, 15 mm for thoracic, and 19 mm for lumbar vertebrae.

Conclusions: This automated approach offers an accurate and widely applicable model for vertebral identification and localization. It has the potential to enhance RT setup workflows and serve as a valuable clinical tool.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110939DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vertebral identification
16
identification localization
16
public datasets
12
automated vertebral
8
vertebral bodies
8
clinical on-board
8
on-board scans
8
infinity® tomotherapy®
8
identification rates
8
identification
7

Similar Publications