Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To compare donor site morbidity and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), knee laxity and early strength and functional outcomes, following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a semitendinosus (ST) tendon autograft with suspensory adjustable button tibial fixation or semitendinosus-gracilis (STG) autograft with tibial screw fixation.

Methods: While 153 patients were prospectively recruited and randomized to an ST or STG autograft, 131 (62 ST and 69 STG) were retained following ACLR and followed post-surgery. Standardized surgical techniques were employed, varying only in graft selection and fixation. The primary study outcomes were early hamstring pain, donor site morbidity and strength recovery. However, several outcomes were assessed pre-surgery and at 3 and 6 months, encompassing the Donor-site-related Functional Problems following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (DFPACLR) score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for hamstring pain and other commonly employed PROMs, anteroposterior laxity (KT-1000), isokinetic hamstring and quadriceps strength, hop testing, complications and re-operations. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed using linear mixed models for continuous data and Mann-Whitney U tests where appropriate.

Results: At 6 months, ST patients reported significantly lower hamstring pain (p < 0.001) and DFPACLR (p < 0.001) scores. A significantly higher (p < 0.001) peak knee flexor strength limb symmetry index (LSI) was observed for the ST group, though no other group differences in side-to-side laxity, hop tests or other normalized strength measures or LSIs were observed.

Conclusions: ACLR using an ST autograft resulted in less donor site pain and morbidity, and improved knee flexor strength symmetry at 6 months, while demonstrating comparable functional outcomes to the STG autograft.

Level Of Evidence: Level 1 prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12698DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

donor site
12
hamstring pain
12
adjustable button
8
site morbidity
8
anterior cruciate
8
cruciate ligament
8
ligament reconstruction
8
stg autograft
8
hamstring
5
semitendinosus adjustable
4

Similar Publications

Background: Sulfur dioxide (SO) is recognized as a major atmospheric pollutant and its excessive emissions can pose a great threat to the environment, flora and fauna, and human health. Long-term exposure to excessive SO can cause chronic poisoning, leading to neurological disorders and cardiovascular diseases. However, there are two sides to everything.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Evolving Role of Echocardiography in Evaluating Donor Hearts on Ex Situ Perfusion.

J Heart Lung Transplant

September 2025

Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité (DHZC), Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Hair transplant surgery is often tended to as a last resort for different types of alopecia. It involves importing hair from a donor site to recipient site using different surgical tools. Surgical interventions hold the risk of causing complications, due to the penetration of skin and exposure of internal tissue to tools and outer environment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Recurrent anterior instability with glenoid bone loss is a difficult problem with several surgical options. The Latarjet technique remains the gold standard for glenoid bone reconstruction in the setting of critical glenoid bone loss with excellent long-term outcomes. However, this technique has well known downsides including high rates of complications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hypertrophic scarring (HTS) remains a critical challenge in burn care, often resulting in debilitating contractures, chronic pain, and significant psychosocial burden. While current treatment emphasizes structural repair, recent advances underscore the importance of addressing the biological drivers of fibrosis. This review synthesizes evolving strategies in burn scar prevention, highlighting tissue-engineered matrices, autologous cell therapies, and predictive molecular tools that shift care from reactive to regenerative.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF