Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Objective: To evaluate the performance of the virtual assistant "Syndromic Diseases and Orofacial Features" (SDOF), developed based on the Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 model, in formulating diagnostic hypotheses and recommendations for syndromes with orofacial manifestations.
Study Design: Twenty-six anonymized, previously diagnosed clinical cases, including clinical features and images, were selected. The assistant was trained using scientific references and configured to generate diagnostic hypotheses and suggest complementary exams. The responses were evaluated by two oral diagnosis specialists based on criteria such as accuracy, completeness, relevance, and comprehensibility. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio software to calculate means and standard deviations.
Results: The SDOF correctly identified 96.2% of the cases, with 80.8% being the first diagnostic hypothesis and 15.4% being the second. In only one case (3.8%), the correct diagnosis was presented as the third hypothesis. The assistant performed best in the criteria "Relevance," "Practicality," and "Readability," while "Completeness" and "Up-to-dateness" scored the lowest. Despite the high accuracy rate, the assistant failed to mention all diagnostic steps in 7.69% of the cases.
Conclusions: The SDOF demonstrated significant potential to assist in the diagnosis of orofacial syndromes, with promising accuracy rates. However, the tool still requires professional supervision and improvements in completeness and up-to-dateness.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2025.04.002 | DOI Listing |