Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Pretreatment is essential for enhancing the energy potential of lignocellulose and also a significant bottleneck for their utilization. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), especially those based on permonosulfate (PMS), have become a research focus due to their mild conditions and high efficiency. However, activation of peroxides in PMS-based AOPs poses a critical challenge, necessitating the development of catalysts that can minimize sulfate consumption while enhancing the pretreatment efficacy. Here, we compared the pretreatment effects of PMS activated by three monometallic iron-based catalysts and LaFeO on sugarcane bagasse. We assessed the enzymatic saccharification yield, chemical component transformation, and substrate physical-chemical properties changes. The LaFeO-activated PMS system outperformed other systems in hemicellulose removal rate (87.73 %), cellulose removal rate (12.12 %), enzymatic saccharification yield (76.39 %), and sugar conversion rate (92.04 %). Compared with α-FeOOH-activated PMS system, LaFeO-activated PMS system produced more free radicals of •OH and SO at the initial stage, and then the free radicals dropped sharply. This free radical generation model enabled the removal of large amounts of lignin and hemicellulose while kept more cellulose, and resulted in the best enzymatic saccharification efficiency. This pretreatment creates favorable conditions for further processing.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.143909 | DOI Listing |