Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Aim: This study aims to develop an indicator system for assessing the humanistic care competencies of nurses in infectious disease hospitals and provide a scientific measurement tool to understand the current humanistic care competencies level of infectious disease nurses.
Design: A mixed-methods design integrating qualitative interviews and a modified Delphi study.
Methods: Initially, we derived a list of potential indicators of humanistic care for nurses in infectious disease hospitals from literature reviews and interviews with a nominal group technique (n=41). Following this, 26 experts from across China participated in two Delphi rounds from May to July 2023. Then the indicators were screened, revised and supplemented using the boundary value method and expert opinions. Next, the hierarchical analysis method was utilised to determine the weights of the indicators.
Results: The average effective response rate across the two Delphi rounds was 94%. The authority coefficients for the first and second rounds were 0.85 and 0.90, respectively, suggesting the experts were highly authoritative. There was a consistent rating among experts with a coordination coefficient for each indicator (p < 0.001). Ultimately, this study identified 4 primary indicators, 8 secondary indicators, and 35 tertiary indicators. The four primary indicators and their weights are basic care competency (0.158), therapeutic care competency (0.544), spiritual care competency (0.158) and safety care competency (0.140).
Conclusion: This research provides a scientifically rigorous and comprehensive framework to evaluate the humanistic care competencies of nurses in infectious disease hospitals in China. This system will serve as an effective tool for evaluating the humanistic care competencies of nurses in specialized infectious disease hospitals in China and other overseas regions.
Implications For The Profession And/or Patient Care: This study provides a new tool to assess the humanistic care competencies of nurses in infectious disease hospitals. Form an effective humanistic care competencies index system that can be used to build and develop the need for nurses to possess different aspects of humanistic care competencies tailored to infectious disease patients in hospitals.
Patient Or Public Contribution: No patients or public contribution.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.17004 | DOI Listing |