Cost-effectiveness of Lynch Syndrome Screening in Colorectal Cancer: Universal Germline vs Sequential Screening.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

Section of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut; Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address:

Published: April 2025


Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background & Aims: Testing all colorectal cancers (CRCs) for mismatch repair status to evaluate for Lynch syndrome (LS) has been recommended for years. Owing to attrition in the multistep diagnostic testing pathway, most qualifying patients still do not receive genetic testing for LS. This leads to missed diagnoses and preventable cancer incidence. To tackle this, we previously reported a systems approach that resulted in a dramatic increase in the identification of patients with LS. We aim to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this intervention compared with both real-world pre-intervention experience and with upfront germline testing of all CRC probands.

Methods: We employed data from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database, the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, and pre-/post-intervention cohort studies to build lifetime Markov cohorts of CRC probands, testing 3 strategies: (1) current standard-of-care; (2) optimized standard-of-care; and (3) upfront germline testing. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in $ per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) from the United States health system perspective.

Results: Strategies #1 to #3 accrued 11.97, 11.98, and 11.99 discounted QALYs at discounted costs of $100,610, $100,980, and $102,290, respectively. The pairwise ICERs on the frontier were $34,500/QALY (95% credible interval [CI], $28,400-$44,200) and $98,500/QALY (95% CI, $73,700-$216,000), respectively. The cost-effectiveness of #3 vs #1 was $70,300/QALY (95% CI, $54,600-$92,500). Current standard-of-care was favored in 0.0% of 10,000 Monte Carlo iterations.

Conclusion: Current clinical practice is cost-ineffective. Prospective intervention to dramatically increase LS testing (ie, to reach a threshold of >75%) or, if this level cannot be reached, upfront germline testing are cost-effective interventions that improve quality-adjusted life expectancy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12354148PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2025.03.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lynch syndrome
12
upfront germline
12
germline testing
12
testing
8
current standard-of-care
8
cost-effectiveness
4
cost-effectiveness lynch
4
syndrome screening
4
screening colorectal
4
colorectal cancer
4

Similar Publications

Background: BMPR2 mutations cause heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and may also influence epithelial carcinogenesis.

Case Summary: We report 3 women with BMPR2-related PAH who developed early onset epithelial cancers: 2 breast cancers (34 and 54 years of age) and 1 colorectal cancer (47 years of age). All were on advanced PAH therapy at diagnosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Intrapatient genomic divergence across multiple primary tumors in young Korean patients.

Korean J Clin Oncol

August 2025

Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.

Purpose: Multiple primary tumors arising in the same individual pose challenges for precision oncology, particularly in the context of hereditary cancer syndromes such as Lynch syndrome. While these tumors may originate from a shared germline predisposition, it remains unclear whether they also share somatic alterations that could be therapeutically exploited. This study aimed to characterize the extent of somatic genomic overlap between synchronous or metachronous gastric and colorectal cancers within young Korean patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study compares three hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) registries-the Iranian Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Registry (IHCCR), the Singapore Polyposis Registry (SPR), and the University of Cape Town Familial CRC Registry-to illuminate diverse approaches to identification, management, and research across different healthcare systems. Each registry, while emphasizing patient diversity, employed unique strategies reflecting available resources and epidemiological contexts. The IHCCR, leveraging WES, revealed considerable genetic heterogeneity, including novel mutations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Tissue microenvironment characteristics associated with elevated risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Lynch syndrome (LS) are poorly characterized. We applied the multimodal single cell sequencing platform ExCITE-seq to define the colonic cellular composition and transcriptome of LS carriers with and without a history of CRC compared with general population controls. Our analysis revealed widespread remodeling in LS that included striking expansion of epithelial stem and progenitor cells, and loss of fibroblast populations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Tissue microenvironment characteristics associated with elevated risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Lynch syndrome (LS) are poorly characterized. We applied the multimodal single cell sequencing platform ExCITE-seq to define the colonic cellular composition and transcriptome of LS carriers with and without a history of CRC compared with general population controls. Our analysis revealed widespread remodeling in LS that included striking expansion of epithelial stem and progenitor cells, and loss of fibroblast populations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF