A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Effect of Meibomian Gland Expression on Optical Quality in Patients with Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the changes in meibomian gland function, ocular surface parameters, and optical quality before and after meibomian gland expression in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).

Methods: Patients with MGD underwent meibomian gland expression once weekly for 4 consecutive weeks. Comprehensive assessments, including the Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire, tear break-up time, corneal fluorescein staining, lid margin abnormality grading, meibum expressibility and quality evaluations, Schirmer I test (SIT), as well as optical quality examinations using the Pentacam and Optical Quality Analysis System II, were conducted before and after the treatment.

Results: 124 eyes of 62 patients were included in the study. Most meibomian gland function and ocular surface parameters showed significant improvement after treatment. Except for and coma ( = .029), no other significant changes in optical quality were observed. Changes in SIT were significantly correlated with changes in total corneal high-order aberrations (tHOA-4mm) ( = -.224,  = .019). Changes in objective scattering index were significantly associated with changes in spherical aberration ( = .219,  = .022), trefoil ( = .797,  < .001), total high-order aberrations ( = .408,  < .001) and total corneal spherical aberration ( = .590,  < .001).

Conclusion: Meibomian gland expression effectively improves meibomian gland function and ocular surface parameters. However, it does not appear to significantly impact optical quality in patients with MGD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2025.2497324DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

meibomian gland
28
optical quality
20
gland expression
12
ocular surface
12
patients meibomian
8
gland dysfunction
8
gland function
8
function ocular
8
surface parameters
8
meibomian
7

Similar Publications