Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Some unprofessional behaviours, including allegations of discrimination, hostile work environment, violent behaviour, sexual boundary violations, potentially impaired clinicians, professional integrity and retaliation, require healthcare organisations to have a timely and reliable process to guide investigation, inquiry and/or interventions. Failure to have a consistent approach creates extraordinary risk for organisations, their team members and their patients.

Methods: Descriptive study of five health systems that participate in a national professionalism collaborative through the Vanderbilt Health Center for Patient and Professional Advocacy (CPPA) and implemented a huddle process to guide the initial disposition of event reports describing unprofessional behaviours that might warrant investigation, inquiry or intervention. Each site applied lessons learnt over the study period to refine the huddle participants, the process for the huddle and the tracking of information based on their experience.

Results: During the study, the participating sites held 219 huddles, which represented <1% of reports processed by CPPA during the study period. The most common type of reports resulting in a huddle included allegations of discrimination (30% of huddles) or hostile work environment (29%). Other common reasons for huddles included violent or aggressive behaviour (15%) or potential sexual boundary violations (13%). Additional reasons for huddles included concerns for an impaired clinician (3%), integrity (2%) or retaliation against a reporter for a previous electronic safety event report (2%).

Conclusions: Implementing a huddle to review and guide next steps for reports including allegations of serious behaviours provided the healthcare organisations a process to reduce the variability of response to such reports and fostered increased communication and trust among organisational key stakeholders.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/leader-2024-001134DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

unprofessional behaviours
12
investigation inquiry
12
inquiry intervention
8
process guide
8
huddles unprofessional
4
behaviours healthcare
4
healthcare setting
4
setting require
4
require investigation
4
intervention background
4

Similar Publications

Evidence-based framework for the management of disruptive physician behavior.

J Healthc Risk Manag

September 2025

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Orange, California, USA.

The consistent promotion of a culture of respect and accountability in the workplace is vital to the success of healthcare organizations. However, the existing literature on practical strategies for addressing misconduct, particularly with respect to physician behavior, is relatively sparse. The aim of this review was to thus devise an evidence-based, empirical framework for the management and remediation of disruptive physician actions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Professional regulation and attitudinal issues: constructing the 'good doctor' and the 'bad apple' through the device of insight.

Med Law Rev

July 2025

Department of Law, School of Law and Social Justice, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZR, United Kingdom.

In fitness-to-practise hearings for doctors and other health care professions, the practitioner's 'insight' into their past misconduct or deficient performance takes centre stage in determining outcomes. Although insight does not feature in the statutory framework, it has emerged as a regulatory device used to distinguish the 'good doctor' from the 'bad apple' who should be excluded from the profession in order to protect the public. This article frames the concept of 'insight' in professional discipline as an example of Foucauldian avowal-a ritual of truth-telling which requires the doctor's full acknowledgement and admission of wrongdoing and a disavowal of their former self.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Incivilities in healthcare, especially in operating rooms, can cause emotional exhaustion, burnout, and reduced job satisfaction. Verbal and physical aggression, harassment, and sexual misconduct are common in surgical environments, negatively impacting healthcare workers and patient safety. This study assessed the prevalence of incivility in anesthesia teams in France and its impact.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Notification of misconduct is a requirement by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulatory Agency. The study focuses on examining the factors that influence the intention to report misconduct by applying the Theory of planned behavior model. The quantitative online survey study using vignettes and questionnaires examined one hundred and seventy-two regulated health professionals on factors that may impact the willingness to report on notifiable conduct.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This review discusses the prevalence of these unethical behaviours, their far-reaching consequences on patient care, and the Orthopaedic field's credibility. It highlights the need for effective strategies to promote ethical standards, emphasizing the importance of awareness among researchers and clinicians. The article outlines specific unethical practices, including data manipulation, which distorts treatment efficacy, and plagiarism, which diminishes originality and wastes peer review resources.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF