Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

One new genus and five new species of the extinct family Maimetshidae from mid-Cretaceous Kachin amber are described based on five well-preserved specimens as follows: Li, Kopylov and Rasnitsyn, sp. nov.; Li, Kopylov and Rasnitsyn, sp. nov.; Li, Kopylov and Rasnitsyn, sp. nov.; Li, Kopylov and Rasnitsyn, sp. nov.; and Li, Kopylov and Rasnitsyn, sp. nov. A new generic synonymy is proposed: Rasnitsyn, 1990 (= Engel, 2016, syn. nov. and = Perrichot, Azar, Nel and Engel, 2011, syn. nov.); Perrichot, Nel and Néraudeau, 2004 (= Perrichot, 2013, syn. nov.); , Rasnitsyn and Brothers, 2009 (=, Rasnitsyn and Brothers, 2009, syn. nov.); and Ortega-Blanco, Delclòs and Engel, 2011 are transferred to Rasnitsyn and Brothers, 2009. This results in the following new combinations: , Rasnitsyn and Jarzembowski, 1998, comb. resurr.; (Perrichot, Azar, Nel & Engel, 2011), comb. nov; (Rasnitsyn & Brothers, 2009), comb. nov; and (Ortega-Blanco, Delclòs & Engel, 2011), comb. nov. The occurrence of various genera of Maimetshidae in amber and compression fossil and the morphological differences of the forewings in all the fossil species are provided, which highlights a high level of genus-level diversity among Mesozoic maimetshids. The key to genera was updated.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11942970PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects16030237DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

kopylov rasnitsyn
20
rasnitsyn nov
20
nov kopylov
16
syn nov
16
engel 2011
16
rasnitsyn brothers
16
brothers 2009
16
nov
12
comb nov
12
rasnitsyn
11

Similar Publications

One new genus and five new species of the extinct family Maimetshidae from mid-Cretaceous Kachin amber are described based on five well-preserved specimens as follows: Li, Kopylov and Rasnitsyn, sp. nov.; Li, Kopylov and Rasnitsyn, sp.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Universal nomenclatural systems in biology are crucial for clear and consistent scientific communication.
  • Recent debates around creating a fairer nomenclature could disrupt these systems, potentially leading to damaging revisions of established names.
  • The four key benefits of objective nomenclature are universality, stability, neutrality, and transculturality, which support unbiased communication and should not be compromised by subjective changes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF