98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic proved to be a formidable crisis leading to massive disruptions in healthcare delivery that compromised routine access to care across the United States. The strain of the pandemic on the healthcare system limited routine outpatient visits and regular follow-up for all patients. Patients struggling with social determinants of health (SDOH) have long suffered from limited access to healthcare and the pandemic exacerbated this issue. Patients with chronic cardiac conditions need regular follow-up to ensure the highest quality of care and limited outpatient accessibility can be highly disruptive to their health. Thus, patients with chronic cardiac conditions who also struggle with SDOH were a population that was particularly vulnerable to the strain of the pandemic.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the urban underserved patient population. Data were collected from the University Health System in Kansas City, MO, between 2019 and 2022. This safety-net hospital was selected because 66% of its patients are on Medicare, Medicaid, or uninsured, making its patient population a strong representation of the larger U.S. population struggling with SDOH. A report of in-person, outpatient cardiology visits scheduled during the specified timeframe was generated with demographic data and visit status. All visits scheduled that were completed or resulted in a no-show were included, with all other visits excluded. No-show rates were calculated overall and within each subgroup analyzed by dividing the number of no-shows by the total number of visits scheduled. No-show rates and percent change in no-show rates by year were analyzed for the whole population and stratified by gender, race, ethnicity, and insurance status.
Results: No-show rates increased in 12 out of 17 (71.0%) patient subgroups including male patients, Black patients, non-Hispanic patients, patients in the "other" category of ethnicity, those on a Self-Pay Discount Program, Medicaid, and Medicaid MC Plus. These groups all had no-show rates suggesting that nearly or greater than a third of their patients were not receiving the cardiovascular care they needed by the end of the pandemic. The highest no-show rates in 2022 were observed in the following patient subgroups: Black 1,915 (35.08%), Self-Pay Discount 490 (39.3%), Medicaid 873 (36.2%), and Medicaid MC Plus 689 (32.9%).
Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased no-show rates for outpatient cardiology visits, particularly among underserved populations, highlighting the vulnerability of low socioeconomic status patients. This disruption in routine care underscores the need for continued development of strategies to ensure consistent healthcare access during crises. University Health System employs many outreach and other programs to help those struggling with SDOH and yet the strain of the pandemic was still seen. Other studies have demonstrated that telehealth may serve as a bridge to addressing care gaps in the underserved population. Further research is required to assess the short and long-term health impacts of missed appointments and to continue developing solutions for improving healthcare access in patients struggling with SDOH.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12009133 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.80897 | DOI Listing |
Access to desired contraceptive care is a critical component of reproductive autonomy. Telemedicine (TM), or the remote provision of clinical services via technology, in community-based health centers has the potential to expand access to family planning services, potentially enhancing both reproductive autonomy and equity. However, little is known about which patient populations use TM for contraceptive services in the US " safety net" (community-based health centers), if there are inequities in access to TM care, or patient preferences for TM contraceptive care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPediatr Blood Cancer
August 2025
Division of Pediatric Psychology and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Introduction: The current study examined the way in which caregiver and child factors relate to caregiver psychological variables and patterns of healthcare utilization for youth with sickle cell disease (SCD).
Methods: Participants included 50 parent/patient dyads (n = 100 total participants) who were recruited from an outpatient pediatric SCD Clinic. Caregivers completed questionnaires to assess caregiver adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), recent emotional distress, and resilience, as well as caregiver/child sociodemographic and clinical factors.
Pediatr Nephrol
August 2025
Department of Pediatrics-Section of Nephrology, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, USA.
Background: Understanding how social determinants of health (SDoH) affect clinical outcomes is important in achieving health equity. The impact of SDoH on pediatric transplant recipients is poorly understood. We investigated the effect of SDoH on pediatric kidney allograft outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
August 2025
Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
This scoping review examines how telemedicine addresses healthcare needs in the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and other sexual and gender minority (LGBTQIA+) community, focusing on gender-affirming care, mental health, and testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). A literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted to identify studies published until March 2024 focusing on telemedicine services for LGBTQIA + individuals. Data extraction captured study characteristics, telemedicine applications, and patient and provider satisfaction, and was synthesized to map current knowledge and identify gaps.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCutis
June 2025
Department of Dermatology and Dermatologic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Residents and fellows face intense demands on their time and finances, where resilience is more realistic than perfect balance. Moonlighting can provide extra income and valuable clinical experience but must be weighed against core training commitments, program policies, and other factors such as office availability, staffing, overhead costs, patient demand, and no-show rates. This article outlines some key factors to consider when embarking on such a decision, including the effects of moonlighting on other commitments and logistics to consider.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF