Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Foot strike type affects running mechanics and may influence overuse injury occurrence. Measuring the interaction between cumulative load and foot strike type may provide additional information that could increase understanding of injury mechanisms.

Hypothesis: There will be no differences in cumulative loading between runners using rearfoot strike (RFS) and nonrearfoot strike (NRFS) patterns. NRFS runners will have a greater stride rate. There will be differences in per stride metrics of select lower extremity mechanics.

Study Design: Observational laboratory study.

Level Of Evidence: Level 3.

Methods: Thirty male participants (age, 22.7 ± 2.9 years; height, 1.79 ± 0.07 m; mass, 70.7 ± 7.86 kg; mean ± SD) ran on an instrumented treadmill for 5 km at 3.15 m/s with their preferred foot strike type (14 RFS, 16 NRFS). Stride rate, foot strike angle, loading rate (LR), per stride and per kilometer (cumulative) vertical ground-reaction force (VGRF) impulse, impact peak, absolute peak, knee negative work, and ankle negative work were calculated and compared across time and between groups.

Results: Per stride differences were seen for stance time, foot strike angle, and LR (greater for RFS runners, = 0.003). Per stride and cumulative ankle and knee negative work showed significant differences (greater ankle negative work for NRFS runners, < 0.001 [per stride and cumulative], greater knee negative work for RFS runners, = 0.01 per stride, = 0.008 cumulative).

Conclusion: Ankle and knee loading metrics showed differences in per stride and cumulative metrics between foot strike groups. Individual variability in VGRF loading patterns was more apparent than group distinctions. The common perception that NRFS runners have a higher stride rate was not supported.

Clinical Relevance: Individual loading patterns, not just foot strike type, and training session characteristics related to cumulative load should be considered when assessing injury risk.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12009271PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19417381251333415DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

foot strike
32
strike type
20
negative work
20
nrfs runners
12
stride rate
12
knee negative
12
strike
10
stride
10
cumulative loading
8
foot
8

Similar Publications

Effect of forefoot strike and toe-out running on hip contact forces: A musculoskeletal modelling-based study.

J Biomech

September 2025

Human Movement Laboratory, School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia; Translational Health Research Institute, School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia.

Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is an increasingly significant public health concern, contributing to substantial economic and societal burden worldwide. Emerging evidence suggests that running may promote cartilage health through optimal joint loading. However, it remains unclear how modifications to running posture, such as altering footstrike patterns or adjusting foot progression angles, affect hip contact forces (HCF).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is a non-motor feature in people with Parkinson's disease that can lead to falls from syncope. Current knowledge is lacking on the effects of OH on gait function.

Methods: Participants enrolled in a prospectively monitored longitudinal cohort who had OH on vitals at one of two consecutive visits approximately 6 months apart were analyzed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Understanding foot joint loading during different dynamic activities is essential information for guiding exercise progression in rehabilitation. While walking and running biomechanics are well studied, joint-specific kinetic data during a single leg drop and hop task, often used in rehabilitation, are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate (1) the kinetic behavior of the ankle, Chopart, Lisfranc, and MTP-1 joints during a drop-hop task under different visual constraints and (2) to contextualize these findings by comparing them with heel-strike running, to assess the relative loading demands of the drop-hop task.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Rear-foot eversion increases the patellofemoral joint stress through the mechanism of lower extremity coupling. Therefore, the present clinical trial aimed to evaluate the effects of altering walking foot strike pattern in combination with lower extremity strengthening on lower limb alignment in females with patellofemoral pain (PFP).

Methods: Forty women with PFP were randomly assigned to experimental (n = 20) and control groups (n = 20).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Chronic degeneration of the plantar fascia at its insertion on the plantar calcaneus, known as plantar fasciitis (PF), is the most common cause of heel pain in adults. The calcaneal fat pad (CFP) is a structure superficial to the plantar fascia and calcaneus, serving a critical purpose in shock absorption at heel strike during gait. To our knowledge, the radiographic relationship between the thickness of the CFP and PF has never been evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF