A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Deep learning model DeepNeo predicts neointimal tissue characterization using optical coherence tomography. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Accurate interpretation of optical coherence tomography (OCT) pullbacks is critical for assessing vascular healing after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Manual analysis is time-consuming and subjective, highlighting the need for a fully automated solution.

Methods: In this study, 1148 frames from 92 OCT pullbacks were manually annotated to classify neointima as homogeneous, heterogeneous, neoatherosclerosis, or not analyzable on a quadrant level. Stent and lumen contours were annotated in 305 frames for segmentation of the lumen, stent struts, and neointima. We used these annotations to train a deep learning algorithm called DeepNeo. Performance was further evaluated in an animal model (male New Zealand White Rabbits) of neoatherosclerosis using co-registered histopathology images as the gold standard.

Results: DeepNeo demonstrates a strong classification performance for neointimal tissue, achieving an overall accuracy of 75%, which is comparable to manual classification accuracy by two clinical experts (75% and 71%). In the animal model of neoatherosclerosis, DeepNeo achieves an accuracy of 87% when compared with histopathological findings. For segmentation tasks in human pullbacks, the algorithm shows strong performance with mean Dice overlap scores of 0.99 for the lumen, 0.66 for stent struts, and 0.86 for neointima.

Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, DeepNeo is the first deep learning algorithm enabling fully automated segmentation and classification of neointimal tissue with performance comparable to human experts. It could standardize vascular healing assessments after PCI, support therapeutic decisions, and improve risk detection for cardiac events.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12006410PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-00835-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

deep learning
12
neointimal tissue
12
optical coherence
8
coherence tomography
8
oct pullbacks
8
vascular healing
8
fully automated
8
stent struts
8
learning algorithm
8
animal model
8

Similar Publications