Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Well designed and properly executed randomised trials are considered the most reliable evidence on the benefits of healthcare interventions. However, there is overwhelming evidence that the quality of reporting is not optimal. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement was designed to improve the quality of reporting and provides a minimum set of items to be included in a report of a randomised trial. CONSORT was first published in 1996, then updated in 2001 and 2010. Here, we present the updated CONSORT 2025 statement, which aims to account for recent methodological advancements and feedback from end users. We conducted a scoping review of the literature and developed a project-specific database of empirical and theoretical evidence related to CONSORT, to generate a list of potential changes to the checklist. The list was enriched with recommendations provided by the lead authors of existing CONSORT extensions (Harms, Outcomes, Non-pharmacological Treatment), other related reporting guidelines (TIDieR) and recommendations from other sources (eg, personal communications). The list of potential changes to the checklist was assessed in a large, international, online, three-round Delphi survey involving 317 participants and discussed at a two-day online expert consensus meeting of 30 invited international experts. We have made substantive changes to the CONSORT checklist. We added seven new checklist items, revised three items, deleted one item, and integrated several items from key CONSORT extensions. We also restructured the CONSORT checklist, with a new section on open science. The CONSORT 2025 statement consists of a 30-item checklist of essential items that should be included when reporting the results of a randomised trial and a diagram for documenting the flow of participants through the trial. To facilitate implementation of CONSORT 2025, we have also developed an expanded version of the CONSORT 2025 checklist, with bullet points eliciting critical elements of each item. Authors, editors, reviewers, and other potential users should use CONSORT 2025 when writing and evaluating manuscripts of randomised trials to ensure that trial reports are clear and transparent.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00672-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

consort 2025
24
consort
13
2025 statement
12
randomised trials
12
reporting randomised
8
quality reporting
8
items included
8
randomised trial
8
list potential
8
potential changes
8

Similar Publications

Background: The Community re-entry program aims to train participants with the skills and information and help to move efficiently through the mental health in-patient setting to more independent living in the community. This quantitative study to explores the effectiveness of community re-entry program on global functioning and medication adherence for patients with bipolar affective disorder.

Material And Methods: The study was a randomized controlled clinical trial and conducted by the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 guidelines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To evaluate the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials on acupuncture for the treatment of stable angina pectoris.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in both Chinese and English databases, including CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, with a focus on studies published from the inception of each database to March 4, 2025. This search aimed to identify clinical RCTs exploring the effectiveness of acupuncture in treating stable angina pectoris.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: This systematic review evaluated the clinical performance, physical-mechanical properties, and accuracy of removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks fabricated using three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies-specifically, selective laser sintering (SLS), selective laser melting (SLM), and direct metal laser sintering (DMLS)-compared to those produced by conventional casting or methods using a partial digital workflow.

Study Selection: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, a literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases in October 2024. Studies were included if they compared the fit, accuracy, mechanical and physical properties, and clinical outcomes of metal RPD frameworks made using 3D printing technologies with those produced using conventional casting or partial digital methods.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: For orthodontists, the position of the incisors is a key factor in setting treatment goals. Achieving maximum stability requires that they be positioned in the medullary portion of the alveolar bone, balanced with the lingual and labial musculature. Incorrect orthodontic movements can result in root resorption, dehiscences, or even fenestrations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This prospective randomized study compares the efficacy of novel intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) to the standard preparation of calcified coronary lesions based on rotational atherectomy (RA).

Methods: A total of 50 patients with 52 calcified lesions were enrolled in the study and randomized 1:1 to be treated with IVL or RA followed by drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. The procedural success was chosen as a primary endpoint and the 12-month late lumen loss (LLL) as measured by quantitative coronarography, the incidence of binary in-stent restenosis (ISR), 12-month major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and target lesion failure (TLF) served as secondary angiographic and clinical endpoints.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF