Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
Mulberry leaves (ML) are nutrient-rich and beneficial for food and feed. Our study evaluated five drying methods-sun drying (SD), air drying (AD), oven drying (OD), freeze drying (FD), and vacuum-microwave drying (MD) for preserving nutrients and bioactivity. In vitro models tested the bioactivities of ML extracts. Results showed that machine-based methods (OD, FD, and MD) were superior to natural processes (SD, AD) retaining nutrients and bioactivity. OD preserved amino acids effectively, FD and MD retained crude protein and fibers, and MD excelled in maintaining the total polyphenols, vitamin E, minerals, and bioactive compounds, enhancing the antioxidant capacity and beneficial effects on lipid metabolism, ROS scavenging, and anti-apoptotic in lipid-laden HepG2 cells. Overall, FD and MD are ideal for high-value products like food and pharmaceuticals, while OD is cost-effective for animal feed. SD and AD lead to significant nutrient loss and are not recommended unless cost is a major concern.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.144018 | DOI Listing |