Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

When humans experience pain during a movement, they can develop fear and avoid this movement afterward; these responses likely play a role in chronic pain. Previous experiments have investigated the underlying learning mechanisms by pairing movements with painful stimuli but, usually, other visuospatial cues were concurrently presented during the learning context. Therefore, participants might have primarily avoided these visuospatial rather than the movement-related cues, potentially invalidating related interpretations of pain-induced movement avoidance. Here, we separated kinesthetic from visuospatial cues to investigate their respective contribution to avoidance. Participants used a hand-held robotic manipulandum and, during an acquisition phase, received painful stimuli during center-out movements. Pain stimuli could be avoided by choosing curved rather than direct movement trajectories. To distinguish the contribution of kinesthetic versus visuospatial cues we tested two generalization contexts: either participants executed novel movements that passed through the same location at which pain had previously been presented in the acquisition phase; or they were reseated and then executed identical movements as those that had been associated with pain, but without passing through the pain-associated spatial location. Avoidance generalization was comparable in both contexts, and remarkably, highly correlated between them. Our findings suggest that both visuospatial and kinesthetic cues available during acquisition were associated with pain and led to avoidance. Our research corroborates previous studies' findings that pain can become associated with movements. However, visuospatial cues also play a critical role for avoidance acquisition. Future studies should distinguish movement-related and space-related associations in pain-related avoidance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001318DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

visuospatial cues
20
kinesthetic visuospatial
8
movement avoidance
8
painful stimuli
8
acquisition phase
8
associated pain
8
visuospatial
7
cues
7
avoidance
7
pain
7

Similar Publications

Safe gait requires visually cued (VC) step adjustments for negotiating targets and obstacles. Effective step adjustments rely on good visuospatial processing. The posterior parietal cortex (PPC) is implicated in visuospatial processing, yet empirical evidence is limited for the PPC's role during gait in humans.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Rumination, a dysfunctional way of thinking, can be counteracted by mindfulness. One leading mechanism through which mindfulness works is a change in perspective on the self, i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Spatial attention is a key function enabling the selection of relevantinformation and meaningful behavioral responses and is likely implemented bydifferent neural mechanisms. In previous work, attention led to robust butuncorrelated modulations of Steady-State-Visual-Evoked-Potentials (SSVEPs) as amarker of early sensory gain and visual as well as motor alpha-band activity. Weprobed the behavioral relevance of attention-modulated trial-by-trialfluctuations of these measures.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Tetris has been shown to reduce intrusions following exposure to experimentally induced and actual traumatic events. However, no study has systematically investigated whether multiple sessions of Tetris produce greater reductions in intrusions than a single session. In this study, 94 participants (58.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Top-down attentional control resilience reveals time-sensitive transcranial magnetic stimulation effects.

Cereb Cortex

July 2025

Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Oxfordlaan 55, 6229 EV, Maastricht, Netherlands.

The frontal eye fields (FEFs) are critically involved in voluntary shifts of attention by sending top-down signals to posterior cortices to modulate local alpha-band activity. However, the exact temporo-spatial dynamics of this process are still unclear. Here, we investigated how covert shifts of attention and associated modulations of posterior alpha power are affected after FEF inhibition by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF