A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Late gadolinium enhancement dispersion for predicting malignant arrhythmic events in patient with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Aims: Arrhythmic risk stratification in patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) remains challenging. The LGE-dispersion mapping is a novel method for the quantification of tissue heterogeneity through the Global Dispersion Score (GDS). We sought to evaluate the usefulness of GDS in arrhythmic risk stratification of DCM patients.

Methods And Results: Consecutive non-ischaemic DCM patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. GDS was calculated in LGE images. During a follow-up of 3.3 years (2 to 6 years), the combined endpoint of sudden cardiac death and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator intervention was considered. The final population included 510 patients (mean age was 56 ± 15 years). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was >35% in 241 patients (47%). LGE was present in 225 patients (45%). Median extent of LGE was 12% of LV mass [interquartile range (IQR) 6-20%]. Among patients with positive LGE, GDS was 0.14 (IQR 0.08-0.20). During follow-up 81 patients had malignant ventricular arrhythmias (8 SCD, 73 appropriate ICD interventions). At Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with GDS > 0.10 had worse prognosis than those with lower values of GDS (P < 0.0001). At multivariate analysis, GDS > 0.10 (HR 2.9, 95% CI: 1.7-5, P = 0.0002) was an independent predictor of events. The prognostic value of GDS was confirmed in subgroups of patients with LVEF ≤ 35% and >35%.

Conclusion: GDS is a useful marker to identify DCM patients at higher risk for malignant arrhythmic events regardless of LVEF and extent of LGE.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaf124DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients
10
gds
9
malignant arrhythmic
8
arrhythmic events
8
non-ischaemic dilated
8
dilated cardiomyopathy
8
arrhythmic risk
8
risk stratification
8
dcm patients
8
extent lge
8

Similar Publications