Category Ranking
98%
Total Visits
921
Avg Visit Duration
2 minutes
Citations
20
Article Abstract
The landscape of healthcare is rapidly changing with the increasing usage of machine and deep learning artificial intelligence and digital tools to assist in various sectors. This study aims to analyze the feasibility of the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) models into healthcare systems. This review included English-language publications from databases such as SCOPUS, PubMed, and Google Scholar between 2000 and 2024. AI integration in healthcare systems will assist in large-scale dataset analysis, access to healthcare information, surgery data and simulation, and clinical decision-making in addition to many other healthcare services. However, with the reliance on AI, issues regarding medical liability, cybersecurity, and health disparities can form. This necessitates updates and transparency on health policy, AI training, and cybersecurity measures. To support the implementation of AI in healthcare, transparency regarding AI algorithm training and analytical approaches is key to allowing physicians to trust and make informed decisions about the applicability of AI results. Transparency will also allow healthcare systems to adapt appropriately, provide AI services, and create viable security measures. Furthermore, the increased diversity of data used in AI algorithm training will allow for greater generalizability of AI solutions in patient care. With the growth of AI usage and interaction with patient data, security measures and safeguards, such as system monitoring and cybersecurity training, should take precedence. Stricter digital policy and data protection guidelines will add additional layers of security for patient data. This collaboration will further bolster security measures amongst different regions and healthcare systems in addition to providing more means to innovative care. With the growing digitization of healthcare, advancing cybersecurity will allow effective and safe implementation of AI and other digital systems into healthcare and can improve the safety of patients and their personal health information.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11999725 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.80676 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Approach to the Postmarket Evaluation of Consumer Wearable Technologies.
JAMA Cardiol
September 2025
Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Importance: Consumer wearable technologies have wide applications, including some that have US Food and Drug Administration clearance for health-related notifications. While wearable technologies may have premarket testing, validation, and safety evaluation as part of a regulatory authorization process, information on their postmarket use remains limited. The Stanford Center for Digital Health organized 2 pan-stakeholder think tank meetings to develop an organizing concept for empirical research on the postmarket evaluation of consumer-facing wearables.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCritical Care Physicians' Perspectives on Nudging in Communication.
JAMA Netw Open
September 2025
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Importance: Research in behavioral economics has demonstrated that people have irrational biases, which make them susceptible to decisional shortcuts, or heuristics. The extent to which physicians consciously might use nudges to exploit these heuristics and thereby influence their patients' decision-making is unclear. In addition, ethical questions about the conscious use of nudges in medicine persist, yet little is known about how physicians experience and perceive their use.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: People with dementia who have a fall can experience both physical and psychological effects, often leading to diminished independence. Falls impose economic costs on the healthcare system. Despite elevated fall risks in dementia populations, evidence supporting effective home-based interventions remains limited.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNuanced Public Support for Rationing Treatments by Withdrawing and Withholding Due to Negative Reimbursement Decisions.
J Bioeth Inq
September 2025
Swedish National Centre for Priorities in Health, Department of Health, Medicine, and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden.
When treatments are deemed not to be cost-effective and face non-reimbursement, policymakers in publicly funded healthcare systems may decide to ration treatments by withholding it from future patients. However, they must also address a critical question: should they also ration treatments by withdrawing it from patients already having access to the treatment, or is there an ethical difference between withdrawing and withholding treatments? To explore this question, we conducted a behavioural experiment (n=1404), examining public support for withdrawing and withholding treatments in reimbursement decisions across eleven different circumstances. Overall, public support for rationing by withdrawing and withholding was low, with no general perceived difference between withdrawing and withholding treatments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWhat happens when the network fails? A response to telesurgery recommendations and a proposal for a new class of intraoperative complications in telesurgery.
J Robot Surg
September 2025
ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.
This Letter to the Editor responds to the recent publication by Patel et al. (J Robot Surg. Jul 11;19(1):370, 2025), which outlines a framework and recommendations for telesurgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF