98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Implementing pharmacogenomic-guided management in cancer patients equitably and effectively in a large population presents challenges. DPYD genotyping determines clinically significant variants of patients at increased risk of developing grade3-5 fluoropyrimidine (FP) toxicity. FP chemotherapies are prescribed for ~16,000 Australians with a 10%-40% grade3-4 toxicity incidence and 1% mortality. Variant carriers can have FP dosing adjusted to improve treatment tolerance without compromising anticancer effect. This strategy has not been formally adopted within Australia, despite widespread international standardisation.
Aim: This pilot study determined genotyping turnaround-times (TAT) for 4 DPYD variants (c.1905+1G>A, c.1679T>G, c.2846A>T and c.1236G>A/Haplotype B3) in Australian patients. Secondary objectives were identification of FP toxicities of DPYD variant carriers, and analysis of healthcare stakeholder perspectives, including enablers/barriers to implementation.
Methods: Genotyping was determined by Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction. Qualitative data were determined through semi-structured questionnaire.
Results: 104 patients recruited over 24 months had a mean TAT of 7.2 days, 5.2 business days (range 1-30). Grade3-4 toxicity occurred in 9/16 DPYD variant carriers, including 2 ICU admissions and 1 death. Themes from 30 questionnaire respondents suggest that clinical environment and resources were fundamental barriers, and motivation to improve patient care was the predominant enabler of change.
Conclusion: DPYD genotyping is feasible for improving precision-oncology for patients requiring FP chemotherapies. A TAT of 7 days is acceptable by both stakeholder respondents and national oncology clinician groups. This pilot study, although small, informs a large national project evaluating prospective DPYD genotyping and its impact on FP tolerability, patient safety and cost-effectiveness in Australia.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imj.16576 | DOI Listing |
Clin Biochem
September 2025
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E6, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, SK S7M 0Z9, Canada. Electronic address:
Background: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and its pro-drug, capecitabine, are widely used to treat solid tumors. Patients with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) deficiency are at increased risk for severe treatment-related toxicity. This study reported the implementation of DPYD genotyping in clinical practice and assessed the impact of genotype-guided dosing on clinical outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBr J Clin Pharmacol
September 2025
Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
Aims: Pharmacogenetic implementation requires awareness of the state-of-the-art practice of laboratories providing pharmacogenetic testing. This study investigated how pharmacogenetic guidelines and recommendations have been implemented over time by Italian laboratories participating in the external quality assessment (EQA) Pharmaco-scheme established since 2019 by the European Molecular genetics Quality Network (EMQN).
Methods: Anonymized clinical pharmacogenetic reports submitted by Italian laboratories participating in the EMQN Pharmaco-scheme between 2019 and 2023 were analysed.
BMJ Case Rep
August 2025
Medical oncology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
We present the case of a male in his early 70s who died after receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, probably due to an undiagnosed dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) deficiency. Despite normal results from standard DPYD genotyping prior to treatment, he developed severe gastrointestinal toxicity that progressed to bowel ischaemia and ultimately death. This case underscores the potential limitations of current genotyping approaches, which may not detect rare or functionally significant DPYD variants.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBr J Clin Pharmacol
August 2025
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht/Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Aims: Several international guidelines recommend DPYD genotype-based dosing in patients treated with fluoropyrimidines. This study evaluates the incidences of severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity between wild-type patients and DPYD variant allele carriers in a real-world patient cohort.
Methods: This retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted in adult patients with a first fluoropyrimidine-based anticancer therapy.
Front Oncol
August 2025
Université Bourgogne Europe, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Service Oncologie Médicale, INSERM, CTM UMR 1231, TIRECS, Dijon, France.
Fluoropyrimidines, including 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and its derivatives, remain the standard first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In recent years, trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102), an orally administered combination drug, has become a common third-line therapy for mCRC and could increasingly be used as first-line treatment. We report, for the first time, the case of an mCRC patient presenting discrepancies in uracilemia between measurements taken during (43.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF