98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer improves the prognosis of high-risk patients. However, whether pathological completed response (pCR) can be used as a surrogate endpoint for de-escalation therapy in patients who are relatively sensitive to treatment remains to be elucidated.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 143 breast cancer patients, with clinical stage (cStage) II-IIIA who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and achieved pCR in a short time (within 16 weeks) from 2012 to 2022. The prognosis of patients was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method, Cox proportional hazards regression models to identify independent clinicopathologic factors affecting prognosis.
Results: The median follow-up period was 47 months, the overall 4-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 95.3% and 96.9%, respectively, in 143 patients with pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The 4-year DFS between the postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and no adjuvant chemotherapy groups was 76.4% and 95.2%, with a significant statistical difference between both groups ( < 0.05). For HER2-positive (HER2+) and Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the addition of targeted therapy or platinum-based drugs had no impact on prognosis. Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognosis showed that only postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy significantly affected prognosis.
Conclusion: Patients with operable cStage II-IIIA breast cancer who achieved pCR after a short period of neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a satisfactory prognosis and may be suitable for chemotherapy "de-escalation." This approach is also a dominant application of neoadjuvant "tailoring therapy."
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11975863 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1574665 | DOI Listing |
J Public Health (Oxf)
September 2025
Benchmark Risk Group, 121 West Wacker Dr., Suite 2800 Chicago, IL 60601, USA.
Background: There is a demand for population level research on the potential genetic-basis of mesothelioma (e.g. BRCA1-associated protein-1 [BAP1]) independent of other risk factors, such as amphibole asbestos exposure.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Surg Oncol
September 2025
Division of Advanced Surgical Oncology, Research and Development Center for New Medical Frontiers, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
Ann Surg Oncol
September 2025
Department of General Surgery, Abdulkadir Yuksel State Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Ann Surg Oncol
September 2025
Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS) Research Group, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol
September 2025
Department of Surgery, Komfo Anoyke Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana.
The International Center for the Study of Breast Cancer Subtypes (ICSBCS) has played a vital role in defining and overcoming many inequities that exist in breast cancer treatment and outcome on a global basis through capacity-building programs that improve the management of breast cancer patients across the African diaspora. ICSBCS activities also fill critical gaps in disparities research related to the genetics of ancestry. Over the past 20 years, ICSBCS teams have spearheaded landmark studies documenting the relevance of genetic African ancestry to breast cancer risk, while also improving the quality of care delivered to patients in diverse communities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF