98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: The timing of insulin administration, particularly for long-acting insulins like insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300), plays a critical role in diabetes management. The choice between daytime and nighttime administration of Gla-300 is a nuanced decision that should be tailored to each patient's unique circumstances. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety profile of insulin initiation with Gla-300 when administered during the day versus at night in adult type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.
Methods: A retrospective observational study included records of adult T2DM patients initiated on Gla-300 with follow-up data of three months. Cases with complete medical records, including hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) levels, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), post-prandial plasma glucose (PPPG), and incidence of hypoglycemic events, were included. Data pertaining to glycaemic control and safety, were extracted and categorized into two groups based on the timing of Gla-300 administration. Records were evaluated over three months and results were statistically analysed. Results: A total of 169 patients, matched for baseline characteristics, showed a significant reduction in glycaemic indices from initiation to the third month. However, intergroup difference was non-significant suggesting that the timing of administration (morning vs. night) does not significantly impact the effectiveness of Gla-300 in lowering the glycemic indices. Incidences of overall hypoglycemic events were numerically lesser in those with morning dosing of Gla-300 at 13.09% as compared to those with night dosing of Gla-300 at 21.17%. Nocturnal hypoglycaemia was numerically lesser in those with morning dosing of Gla-300 at 3.57% as compared to those with night dosing of Gla-300 at 7.05% observed. However, these intergroup differences were insignificant (p> 0.05).
Conclusion: Timing of Gla-300 initiation, morning compared to night dosing, does not significantly impact the effectiveness in lowering the glycemic indices. Incidences of overall and nocturnal hypoglycemic events were numerically lower with morning dosing of Gla-300 compared to night dosing of Gla-300, though it was not statistically significant. An individualized approach to timing and selection of insulin therapy is essential for optimizing glycemic control and minimizing hypoglycemia risk.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11969625 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.80050 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
March 2025
Endocrinology, Narayana Health, Rabindranath Tagore International Institute of Cardiac Sciences, Kolkata, Kolkata, IND.
Background: The timing of insulin administration, particularly for long-acting insulins like insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300), plays a critical role in diabetes management. The choice between daytime and nighttime administration of Gla-300 is a nuanced decision that should be tailored to each patient's unique circumstances. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety profile of insulin initiation with Gla-300 when administered during the day versus at night in adult type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDiabetes Ther
January 2025
Abteilung für Diabetologie, Endokrinologie, Gastroenterologie und Klinische Forschung, Kinder- und Jugendkrankenhaus Auf der Bult, Hannover, Germany.
Introduction: Appropriate glycemic control is paramount for people with type 1 diabetes (PwT1D) by the effective delivery of exogenous insulin. However, glycemic variability and the risk of severe hypoglycemia must be reliably controlled.
Methods: COMET-T is a prospective, multicenter, observational study conducted in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland during 2021-2022 to assess the effectiveness and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) after switching from other basal insulins.
Acta Diabetol
September 2024
Division of Pediatrics, Department of Health Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.
Aims: Glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) has been recently approved for use in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, real-world effectiveness data are scarce, and aim of this analysis was to assess clinical outcomes in young patients with T1D switching from 1st generation basal insulin (1BI) to Gla-300.
Methods: ISPED CARD is a retrospective, multicenter study, based on data anonymously extracted from Electronic Medical Records.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis
August 2024
Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Unit of Internal Medicine and Diabetes, Federico II University School of Medicine and Institute of Experimental Endocrinology and Oncology, National Research Council, Napoli, Italy; AOU Federico II, Napoli, Italy.
Background: This analysis assessed the cost-effectiveness of insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) versus insulin glargine 100 units/mL (Gla-100) in insulin-naïve adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs).
Methods: Costs and outcomes for Gla-300 versus Gla-100 from a US healthcare payer perspective were assessed using the BRAVO diabetes model. Baseline clinical data were derived from EDITION-3, a 12-month randomized controlled trial comparing Gla-300 with Gla-100 in insulin-naïve adults with inadequately controlled T2D on OADs.