A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Cementless Hemiarthroplasty Complication Risk Does Not Support Contemporary Utilization Patterns. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Hemiarthroplasty (HA) is commonly performed in the setting of femoral neck fracture to allow for early mobilization. Fixation of the femoral component can be either press fit or cemented. The purpose of this study was to compare cemented and cementless HA utilization and complications.

Methods: A multicenter retrospective analysis was performed on hip fracture patients from 2010 to 2019. The primary outcome of this study was revision due to periprosthetic fracture. Secondary outcomes included operative time, surgical complications, and mortality. Logistic regression was performed to compare the risk of various complications, adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, and comorbidity status.

Results: During this time period, cementless HA (577, 58.6%) was more commonly performed than cemented HA (407, 41.4%). There was a trend toward increasing cemented fixation over the study period (P < 0.001). Cementless HA patients were younger (77 versus 81, P < 0.001) and had shorter operative times (90.5 ± 35.7 versus 105.0 ± 38.7 minutes, P < 0.001). However, cementless HA patients were less likely to return to independent ambulation (8.2 versus 19.2%, P < 0.001), more likely to undergo revision surgery for periprosthetic fracture (2.6 versus 0.3%, P = 0.0035; odds ratio [OR] 11.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43 to 85.38), P = 0.021), and had higher dislocation rates (6.1 versus 2.7%, P = 0.014; OR 2.29 (CI 1.13 to 4.67), P = 0.022). Periprosthetic joint infection rates were comparable between groups (4.0 versus 4.9%, P = 0.48; OR 0.71 (CI 0.38 to 1.36), P = 0.31). The 90-day mortality was lower with cementless HA (10.8 versus 19.2%, P < 0.001), though mortality rates were comparable at the final follow-up (OR 1.23 [CI 0.94 to 1.62], P = 0.13).

Conclusions: The surgical complication risk of cementless HA for femoral neck fracture is higher than cemented HA, with an 11-fold increased risk of periprosthetic fracture compared to cemented HA. Surgeons may consider routine use of cemented fixation for hemiarthroplasties performed for femoral neck fractures to mitigate the risk of fracture and need for further surgical intervention.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.067DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

femoral neck
12
periprosthetic fracture
12
complication risk
8
commonly performed
8
neck fracture
8
cemented fixation
8
0001 cementless
8
cementless patients
8
versus 192%
8
192% 0001
8

Similar Publications