A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Accuracy of a deep neural network for automated pulmonary embolism detection on dedicated CT pulmonary angiograms. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Purpose: To assess the performance of a Deep Neural Network (DNN)-based prototype algorithm for automated PE detection on CTPA scans.

Methods: Patients who had previously undergone CTPA with three different systems (SOMATOM Force, go.Top, and Definition AS; Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) because of suspected PE from September 2022 to January 2023 were retrospectively enrolled in this study (n = 1,000, 58.8 % women). For detailed evaluation, all PE were divided into three location-based subgroups: central arteries, lobar branches, and peripheral regions. Clinical reports served as ground truth. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were determined to evaluate the performance of DNN-based PE detection.

Results: Cases were excluded due to incomplete data (n = 32), inconclusive report (n = 17), insufficient contrast detected in the pulmonary trunk (n = 40), or failure of the preprocessing algorithms (n = 8). Therefore, the final cohort included 903 cases with a PE prevalence of 12 % (n = 110). The model achieved a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 84.6, 95.1, 70.5, and 97.8 %, respectively, and delivered an overall accuracy of 93.8 %. Among the false positive cases (n = 39), common sources of error included lung masses, pneumonia, and contrast flow artifacts. Common sources of false negatives (n = 17) included chronic and subsegmental PEs.

Conclusion: The proposed DNN-based algorithm provides excellent performance for the detection of PE, suggesting its potential utility to support radiologists in clinical reading and exam prioritization.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112077DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

deep neural
8
neural network
8
sensitivity specificity
8
common sources
8
accuracy deep
4
network automated
4
automated pulmonary
4
pulmonary embolism
4
embolism detection
4
detection dedicated
4

Similar Publications