A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Enlargement of microvascular dropout toward the disc-fovea axis indicates new central visual field defect in glaucoma. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the relationship between the increase in choroidal microvascular dropout (MvD) toward the disc-fovea axis and the development of central visual field defect (CVFD) in patients with glaucoma. We retrospectively reviewed the longitudinal medical records of patients who underwent at least two optical coherence tomography angiographies (OCTA) with significant macular retinal ganglion cell (RGC) damage at baseline. Patients were divided into three groups: Group 1, no CVFD; Group 2, new CVFD during the follow-up period; and Group 3, CVFD at baseline. The angular extent of MvD and the change were investigated. We had 35 eyes in Group 1, 25 in Group 2, and 43 in Group 3 with OCTA over an average of 3.1 ± 1.3 years. At baseline, MvD was significantly more frequent and larger in Group 3 compared to Groups 1 and 2; there was no difference between Groups 1 and 2, aligning with the absence of baseline CVFD. The mean final MvD extent was significantly smaller in Group 1 (9.9°) than Groups 2 and 3 (43.6 and 44.8°, P < 0.001), also aligning with the presence of final CVFD. Quantitatively, Group 2 with developing CVFD exhibited significantly greater mean increase in MvD (17.8°) than Groups 1 and 3 (0.9 and 6.0°, P < 0.001). In contrast, the changes in OCT-based thicknesses did not differ among the three groups in the period. In conclusion, in patients with glaucoma who had significant RGC damage in the macular area, longitudinal increase in MvD coincided with development of new CVFD, both in terms of the presence and in terms of angular extent, in a three-year follow-up period.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11962064PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87245-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

group cvfd
12
microvascular dropout
8
disc-fovea axis
8
central visual
8
visual field
8
field defect
8
group
8
group group
8
cvfd
5
enlargement microvascular
4

Similar Publications