Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Aims: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication of arthroplasty, with substantial morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, inconsistencies in outcome reporting have hindered evidence synthesis, limiting progress in understanding and management. This study aimed to develop a core outcome set (COS) for PJI to standardize outcome reporting in the literature.

Methods: A two-stage modified Delphi process was conducted to establish consensus across a range of domains. Stage 1 involved the identification of core outcomes in PJI research by an international expert panel. A patient group was also consulted to ensure that the domains were relevant to patient priorities. Stage 2 included a broader group of 55 stakeholders in an online consensus process to finalize the COS. Quantitative and qualitative data were collated to redefine the outcomes throughout the Delphi process.

Results: Following the modified two-stage Delphi process, a high level of consensus was achieved for all outcomes. The final COS included 23 outcomes across the following four domains: patient demographics and baseline characteristics; infection characteristics; surgical and treatment details; and outcomes and follow-up.

Conclusion: The developed COS provides a standardized framework for reporting outcomes in PJI research. By addressing variability and inconsistency in the literature, this COS aims to enhance comparability across studies, support robust evidence synthesis, and ultimately guide clinical decision-making.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B4.BJJ-2024-1727DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

periprosthetic joint
8
joint infection
8
core outcome
8
outcome set
8
outcome reporting
8
evidence synthesis
8
delphi process
8
outcomes pji
8
outcomes
6
cos
5

Similar Publications

Background: Differentiating periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) from aseptic failure is challenging in total joint arthroplasty. To date, there is no consensus about the most accurate criteria to diagnose PJI. The current study compares common diagnostic PJI criteria.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Periprosthetic joint infection: Time to think outside the box.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

September 2025

International Joint Center, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Despite undisputed success of orthopaedic procedures, surgical site infections (SSI) such as periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) continues to compromise the outcome and result in major clinical and economic burden. The overall rate of infection is expected to rise in the future resulting in significant associated mortality and morbidity. Traditional concepts have largely attributed the source of PJI to exogenous pathogens.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This study evaluated the applicability of histopathology, culture, and Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

Methods: In this prospective trial, 215 consecutive patients with suspected knee PJI were enrolled. Tissue specimens were aseptically collected and processed for histopathological analysis, culture, and mNGS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Debridement, antimicrobial therapy, and implant retention for acute periprosthetic infections].

Orthopadie (Heidelb)

September 2025

Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Sportorthopädie, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.

Background: The DAIR procedure (debridement, antibiotic therapy, and implant retention) represents a treatment option for acute periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). Compared to revision arthroplasty, it is technically less invasive and, under appropriate indications, can preserve a well-fixed endoprosthesis. However, treatment success depends on numerous patient-, pathogen-, and procedure-related factors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the direct anterior approach (DAA) is a preferred surgical technique due to its benefits, including reduced soft tissue disruption and faster recovery. However, obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m, poses unique challenges in DAA-THA, increasing the risk of complications and technical difficulties. This systematic review aims to assess the clinical and functional outcomes, complication rates, and reoperation rates in obese patients undergoing DAA-THA compared to non-obese patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF