Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background Context: The management of type II odontoid fractures in elderly patients presents significant clinical challenges. Surgical treatment may lead to operative complications, while conservative management may increase the risk of non-osseous union, potentially compromising fracture stability.

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the safety of non-osseous union subtypes in type II odontoid fractures following conservative treatment and to identify risk factors for unstable fractures.

Study Design: A multi-institutional retrospective cohort study.

Patient Sample: A total of 307 patients with acute type II odontoid fractures treated conservatively between 2005 and 2022 were included. The mean age was 76±17 years, with a median follow-up of 24 months (IQR 9-55 months).

Outcome Measures: Fracture healing and stability were assessed. Safety of each healing subtype was determined by the incidence of new neurological deficits post collar removal or the need for surgical fixation. Risk factors for unstable fractures were also determined.

Methods: Fracture healing was classified as osseous union, fibrous nonunion, or unstable nonunion based on CT and dynamic X-rays at collar removal. Fracture stability was assessed using only dynamic X-rays, with unstable fractures demonstrating active displacement. Neurological outcomes and the necessity for surgical fixation in each group were compared. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze risk factors for fracture instability.

Results: Unstable nonunion occurred in 25% of patients, while fibrous nonunion occurred in 48% after a median collar wear of 3.7 months (IQR 2.9-6.2 months). New neurological deficits after collar removal were seen in 6% of patients with unstable nonunions during follow-up, but in none of those with fibrous nonunions or osseous unions, even after subsequent trauma. Risk factors for unstable nonunion included male sex (OR 2.14; 95% CI: 1.02-4.49), osteoporosis/osteopenia (OR 2.50; 95% CI: 1.17-5.37), and baseline fracture displacement (OR 4.81; 95% CI: 2.35-9.86).

Conclusions: Fibrous nonunion is a viable outcome in conservatively managed type II odontoid fractures, reducing the need for surgery or prolonged collar wear. Risk factors for unstable nonunion included male sex, osteoporosis/osteopenia, and baseline fracture displacement. Unstable nonunions may lead to new neurological deficits occurring after collar removal in a small percentage of cases.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

type odontoid
20
risk factors
20
odontoid fractures
16
factors unstable
16
collar removal
16
unstable nonunion
16
non-osseous union
12
neurological deficits
12
fibrous nonunion
12
unstable
9

Similar Publications

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate patterns of surgical treatment of nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures.

Summary Of Background Data: Odontoid fractures represent ∼1/3 of all cervical spine fractures, resulting from low-energy mechanisms in the elderly.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Purpose: We assessed the predisposition to type II odontoid fractures (T2OFs) in elderly people by comparing patients who had T2OFs with those who had sub-axial fractures.

Overview Of Literature: T2OFs are common among elderly people; osteoporosis and degenerative changes in the upper cervical spine are major risk factors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Objectives: Odontoid fractures are often managed surgically. The most common approaches are anterior dens screw (ADS) and posterior arthrodesis (PA), with the latter being associated with significantly higher fusion rates. PA techniques can include wiring, C1-C2 transarticular (TA) screws, and C1 lateral mass (LM)-C2 pars/pedicle screws.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The options for the management of type II odontoid fractures in young patients include anterior screw fixation, posterior spinal fusion, or halo-vest immobilization (HVI). However, there is a recent trend away from nonoperative management and an increase in primary operative stabilization across several centers. Hence, our study aims to compare the functional and radiological outcomes of type II odontoid fractures in young patients managed with HVI and surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Objectives: Type II odontoid fractures (T2OF) are the most prevalent cervical spine injuries among the elderly. Nonetheless, there are insufficient data regarding the influence of frailty on outcomes for both nonoperative and operative treatment approaches. We sought to evaluate the influence of frailty on outcomes using 5-factor modified frailty index.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF