Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once
98%
921
2 minutes
20
To reveal the differences in nutritional quality among diploid, triploid, and fattening oysters, nutrient and taste-contributing compounds were analyzed. The results demonstrate that diploid oysters exhibited significantly higher meat yield (22.88 %), protein (48.27 ± 2.50 g/100 g), total fatty acids (3032.52 ± 518.16 mg/100 g), vitamin B, mineral and flavor compounds than triploid and fattening oyster ( < 0.05). In contrast, triploid oysters exhibited higher lipid (10.02 ± 0.60 mg/100 g) and fat-soluble vitamin, and fattening oysters have higher EAA content (12.31 ± 0.69 mg/100 g) ( < 0.05). The edible quality of the three oyster types was evaluated using PCA and their nutrition value was assessed based on the NRF index score. The consistent rank results of the above two evaluation methods were diploid > triploid > fattening. The research results will provide data for oyster grading evaluation standards, thereby promoting the nutritional and health-oriented transformation of the oyster industry.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11915176 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2025.102320 | DOI Listing |