98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Although patients with high bleeding risk (HBR) often have complex coronary artery lesions, it is not known whether intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves their prognosis. We sought to investigate the benefit of intravascular imaging-guided PCI for complex coronary artery lesions in patients with HBR.
Methods: This was a secondary analysis of the RENOVATE-COMPLEX-PCI trial (Randomized Controlled Trial of Intravascular Imaging Guidance Versus Angiography-Guidance on Clinical Outcomes After Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) in which patients with complex coronary artery lesions undergoing PCI were enrolled at 20 sites in Korea from May 2018 through May 2021. Patients were randomized to receive intravascular imaging-guided PCI or angiography-guided PCI and classified according to the presence of HBR. The primary end point was target vessel failure, which was a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization.
Results: Of 1639 trial population, 478 patients met HBR criteria. There was no significant difference in the risk of the primary end point between HBR and non-HBR patients (11.8% versus 8.2%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.05 [95% CI, 0.72-1.54]; =0.790). However, patients with HBR were at higher risk for cardiac death or spontaneous target vessel-related myocardial infarction (adjusted HR, 2.04 [95% CI, 1.09-3.80]; =0.025), all-cause death (adjusted HR, 3.30 [95% CI, 1.93-5.62]; <0.001), and cardiac death (adjusted HR, 2.36 [95% CI, 1.10-5.09]; =0.028). Intravascular imaging-guided PCI showed a lower risk of the primary end point compared with angiography-guided PCI in both HBR patients (9.7% versus 15.8%; adjusted HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.31-1.02]; =0.060) and non-HBR patients (6.9% versus 10.8%; adjusted HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.43-0.99]; =0.045), without significant interaction ( for interaction=0.796).
Conclusions: Patients with HBR were associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events after complex PCI compared with those without HBR. Intravascular imaging-guided PCI showed a lower risk of the target vessel failure without significant interaction between treatment strategy and the presence of HBR in patients undergoing complex PCI.
Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03381872.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014952 | DOI Listing |
Am J Cardiol
September 2025
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. Electronic address:
Despite the established clinical efficacy following intravascular imaging (IVI)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) than angiography-guided PCI, evidence regarding prognostic benefits of IVI-guided PCI in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with high thrombus burden remains limited. Using the nationwide registries of KAMIR-NIH and KAMIR-V, we evaluated the prognostic impact of IVI-guided PCI in AMI patients with high thrombus burden. A total of 4,074 patients with AMI and TIMI thrombus grades 4 or 5 who underwent aspiration thrombectomy were selected, of whom 892 patients (21.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Med (Lausanne)
August 2025
Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Objective: Drug-coated balloons have emerged as a pivotal alternative to drug-eluting stents in the interventional management of coronary artery disease, particularly showing clinical advantages in the treatment of in-stent restenosis and small-vessel disease. This study provides a systematic bibliometric analysis of publication trends, research hotspots, and future directions in DCB-related CAD research from 2004 to June 2025.
Methods: A total of 1,092 publications indexed in the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases were analyzed using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and bibliometrix.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis
August 2025
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University Hospital of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) has advanced significantly with the incorporation of imaging and physiology assessment techniques. Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) and Non-Hyperemic Pressure indices (NHPIs) provide information regarding the functional significance of coronary lesions, while Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) enhance anatomical characterization and guide stent implantation. This review explores the implementation of physiology- and imaging-guided strategies in clinical practice, comparing their efficacy and limitations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJACC Cardiovasc Interv
July 2025
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. Electronic address:
Background: Previous trials have shown that coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) has better clinical outcomes compared with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with left main coronary artery or 3-vessel disease. However, it is unclear whether intravascular imaging (IVI)-guided PCI would reduce the difference in clinical events compared to CABG.
Objectives: The present study sought to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with left main or 3-vessel disease who underwent IVI-guided PCI with those who underwent CABG.
Cardiovasc Interv Ther
August 2025
Department of Cardiology, Teikyo University Hospital, Itabashi, Japan.
Performing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for heavily calcified coronary lesions remains a significant clinical challenge. In 2023, following the availability of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL), a consensus document was published outlining imaging-guided device selection strategies for the treatment of calcified lesions. Since the publication of that document, the DUAL-PREP study has demonstrated the safety of combining rotational atherectomy (rotablator) with IVL, a strategy previously contraindicated in the original consensus.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF