98%
921
2 minutes
20
Understanding cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying quantity processing is crucial for unraveling human cognition. The existence of a single magnitude system, encompassing non-symbolic number estimation alongside other magnitudes like time and space, is still highly debated since clear evidence is limited. Recent research examined whether spatial biases also influence numerosity judgments, using visual illusions like the Delboeuf illusion. While findings support a generalized magnitude system, direct comparisons of spatial and numerical Delboeuf illusions are missing. This study explored whether perceptual biases similarly affect different magnitude processing and whether transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) modulates these processes. Participants underwent three tACS conditions (seven Hz, 18 Hz, placebo) while performing tasks involving the classic and numerical Delboeuf illusions. We hypothesized that theta-frequency tACS (seven Hz) would enhance visual integration and illusion strength, while beta tACS (18 Hz) would reduce it by promoting visual segregation. Results indicated higher discrimination accuracy in area-based tasks than numerical judgments. Nonetheless, a significant correlation between performances in spatial and numerical illusions supported the existence of a shared mechanism for magnitude processing. Contrary to expectations, seven Hz tACS reduced the perceptual illusion's strength. No significant interaction emerged between tACS frequency and discrimination abilities. These findings deepen our understanding of the cognitive processes involved in magnitude perception, potentially supporting the hypothesis of a generalized magnitude system. They also highlight the potential and limitations of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as tACS, in modulating perceptual processes, offering insights into the neural underpinnings of quantity perception.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11905914 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.19064 | DOI Listing |
PeerJ
May 2025
Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Understanding cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying quantity processing is crucial for unraveling human cognition. The existence of a single magnitude system, encompassing non-symbolic number estimation alongside other magnitudes like time and space, is still highly debated since clear evidence is limited. Recent research examined whether spatial biases also influence numerosity judgments, using visual illusions like the Delboeuf illusion.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnim Cogn
June 2023
Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Discriminating between different quantities is an essential ability in daily life that has been demonstrated in a variety of non-human vertebrates. Nonetheless, what drives the estimation of numerosity is not fully understood, as numerosity intrinsically covaries with several other physical characteristics. There is wide debate as to whether the numerical and spatial abilities of vertebrates are processed by a single magnitude system or two different cognitive systems.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPsychol Res
June 2020
Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Via Weiss, 21, building "W", 34128, Trieste, Italy.
Both numerical and non-numerical magnitudes elicit similar Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC) effects, with small magnitudes associated with left hand responses and large magnitudes associated with right hand responses (Dehaene et al., J Exp Psychol Gen 122(3), 371, 1993). In the present study, we investigated whether the phenomenal size of visual illusions elicits the same SNARC-like effect revealed for the physical size of pictorial surfaces.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF