A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting in-hospital mortality for ischemic stroke patients in ICU. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Timely and accurate outcome prediction is essential for clinical decision-making for ischemic stroke patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, the interpretation and translation of predictive models into clinical applications are equally crucial. This study aims to develop an interpretable machine learning (IML) model that effectively predicts in-hospital mortality for ischemic stroke patients.

Methods: In this study, an IML model was developed and validated using multicenter cohorts of 3225 ischemic stroke patients admitted to the ICU. Nine machine learning (ML) models, including logistic regression (LR), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), naive Bayes (NB), decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), XGBoost, LightGBM, and artificial neural network (ANN), were developed to predict in-hospital mortality using data from the MIMIC-IV and externally validated in Shanghai Changhai Hospital. Feature selection was conducted using three algorithms. Model's performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and F1 score. Calibration curve and Brier score were used to evaluate the degree of calibration of the model, and decision curve analysis were generated to assess the net clinical benefit. Additionally, the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was employed to evaluate the risk of in-hospital mortality among ischemic stroke patients admitted to the ICU.

Results: Mechanical ventilation, age, statins, white blood cell, blood urea nitrogen, hematocrit, warfarin, bicarbonate and systolic blood pressure were selected as the nine most influential variables. The RF model demonstrated the most robust predictive performance, achieving AUROC values of 0.908 and 0.858 in the testing set and external validation set, respectively. Calibration curves also revealed a high consistency between observations and predictions. Decision curve analysis showed that the model had the greatest net benefit rate when the prediction probability threshold is 0.10 ∼ 0.80. SHAP was employed to interpret the RF model. In addition, we have developed an online prediction calculator for ischemic stroke patients.

Conclusion: This study develops a machine learning-based calculator to predict the probability of in-hospital mortality among patients with ischemic stroke in ICU. The calculator has the potential to guide clinical decision-making and improve the care of patients with ischemic stroke by identifying patients at a higher risk of in-hospital mortality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105874DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ischemic stroke
32
in-hospital mortality
24
stroke patients
16
machine learning
12
mortality ischemic
12
interpretable machine
8
ischemic
8
stroke
8
clinical decision-making
8
iml model
8

Similar Publications