A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Comparative effectiveness of various nonpharmacological interventions, including traditional Chinese medicine-based interventions for cancer-related cognitive impairment: a comprehensive network meta-analysis. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Cancer-related cognitive impairment is a common complication of cancer and its treatment. The effectiveness of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM)-based interventions in improving subjective and objective cognitive function has not yet been investigated in previous network meta-analyses. This study aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions including TCM-based interventions, and to rank the best option for improving cognitive function among adults with non-central nervous system cancer.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, ProQuest, Scopus, and CNKI were searched from their inception until May 2024, for relevant randomized controlled trials. A random-effects model was utilized for conducting network meta-analysis. The primary endpoint evaluated the impact of interventions on subjective or objective cognitive function.

Results: In total, 84 randomized controlled trials were included and 15 nonpharmacological interventions were identified with no reported significant adverse events. Tai Chi/Qigong demonstrated the highest probability (SMD = 2.10, 95% CI 0.62 to 3.59) of improving subjective cognitive function. Cognitive rehabilitation was ranked the best with the highest probability for improving overall cognitive function (SMD = 1.49, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.58) and executive function as well as language domains. Acupoint stimulation was the top-ranking approach for enhancing visuospatial and motor function domain (SUCRA 84.3%, SMD = 0.94, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.76).

Conclusions: Tai Chi/Qigong demonstrated the highest effectiveness in addressing subjective cognitive complaints. Cognitive rehabilitation was the most effective intervention across various domains including overall objective cognitive function, executive function, and language. Acupoint simulation was the most effective intervention for improving visuospatial and motor domain functions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf059DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cognitive function
20
nonpharmacological interventions
12
objective cognitive
12
cognitive
11
comparative effectiveness
8
effectiveness nonpharmacological
8
interventions including
8
traditional chinese
8
cancer-related cognitive
8
cognitive impairment
8

Similar Publications