98%
921
2 minutes
20
The advent of the era of highly effective reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke has reawakened interest in neuroprotective treatments as they are far more likely to be efficacious as synergistic complements to reperfusion rather than standalone interventions. However, testing neuroprotective agents combined with reperfusion mandates not only renewed conduct of trials but also a fundamental reconceptualization of the subclasses of neuroprotection therapies. We propose a new taxonomy of neuroprotective treatment agents appropriate for the reperfusion era that recognizes six broad classes of agents, each targeting a distinct process and time epoch of injury: (1) Bridging neuroprotectives slow infarct expansion in the pre-reperfusion period, (2) Blood-brain barrier stabilizers restore the integrity of BBB before and early after reperfusion, (3) Microcirculation lumen preservers protect arteriolar and capillary endothelial cell integrity deterring the no-reflow phenomenon, (4) Reperfusion injury preventors block inflammatory, oxidative, and other processes that start immediately after reperfusion, (5) Edema reducers avert cerebral swelling and secondary injury due to brain tissue compression and herniation, and (6) Delayed neuroprotectives mitigate injury due to apoptosis and mitochondrial dysfunction in the late post-reperfusion period. This approach also broadly distinguishes neuroprotection from other major treatment strategies, including recanalization, collateral enhancement, and neurorepair. By focusing on broad physiologic targets of action rather than granular molecular mechanisms, this six-fold classification of neuroprotection can inform the design of preclinical studies and human clinical trials, including imaging biomarker endpoint selection and treatment timing. This updated taxonomy may accelerate the translation of cerebroprotective agents from bench to bedside.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878098 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1514924 | DOI Listing |
Eur J Neurol
September 2025
Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Background: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) encompasses diverse clinical phenotypes, primarily characterized by behavioral and/or language dysfunction. A newly characterized variant, semantic behavioral variant FTD (sbvFTD), exhibits predominant right temporal atrophy with features bridging behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD) and semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA). This study investigates the longitudinal structural MRI correlates of these FTD variants, focusing on cortical and subcortical structural damage to aid differential diagnosis and prognosis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Neurochem
September 2025
Cellular Neurobiology, Institute for Zoology and Anthropology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Erythropoietin (Epo) and its non-erythropoietic splice variant EV-3 have demonstrated potent neuroprotective effects across species, although the respective mechanisms are variable and incompletely understood. Unlike vertebrates, insects lack both Epo and the classical Epo receptor but express Cytokine Receptor-Like Factor 3 (CRLF3), a conserved type I receptor that serves as a neuroprotective receptor for Epo and EV-3 in insects and human iPSC-derived neuron-like cells. Insects, which express CRLF3 but lack all other group 1 type I cytokine receptors, represent a suitable model to study the function of CRLF3 in neuroprotection.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Chem Inf Model
September 2025
Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences (CHIBIOFARAM), University of Messina, Viale Ferdinando D'Alcontres 13, I-98166 Messina, Italy.
Sigma (σ) receptors (SRs) have emerged as important therapeutic targets due to their roles in various biological pathways. They are classified into two subtypes: S1R, primarily distributed in the central nervous system and related to neuroprotection and neurodegenerative diseases, and S2R mainly expressed in cancer cells and associated with cell proliferation and apoptosis, as well as in neurons. Although S1R and S2R exhibit structural differences in receptor architecture and assembly, they share similar binding site features and ligand recognition mechanisms.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMol Neurodegener
August 2025
Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Background: Diagnosis of Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and its specific underlying neuropathologies (frontotemporal lobar degeneration; FTLD-Tau and FTLD-TDP) are challenging, and thus, fluid biomarkers are needed to improve diagnostic accuracy.
Methods: We used proximity extension assays to analyze 665 proteins in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from a multicenter cohort, which included patients with FTD ( = 189), Alzheimer’s Disease dementia (AD; = 232), and cognitively unimpaired individuals ( = 196). In a subset, FTLD neuropathology was determined based on phenotype or genotype (FTLD-Tau = 87 and FTLD-TDP = 67).
Dent J (Basel)
July 2025
Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a chronic, painful, idiopathic condition of the oral cavity, characterized by the absence of visible pathological changes on the oral mucosa and normal laboratory findings. Recent evidence from the literature supports the classification of BMS as a neuropathic condition. It has been proposed that oxidative stress may contribute to neuropathic pain.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF