A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1075
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3195
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Outcomes from the Victorian Healthy Homes Program: a randomised control trial of home energy upgrades. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Objectives: The Victorian Healthy Homes Program investigated the impact of thermal home upgrades on energy and health outcomes in vulnerable, older individuals over winter in Victoria, Australia.

Design: A staggered parallel-group randomised control trial design of 984 (764 per protocol (PP)) vulnerable households and 1313 (1015 PP) individuals. The intervention group received their upgrade prior to their winter of recruitment, and the control group received their upgrade after the winter of their recruitment.

Setting: Western Melbourne (metropolitan) and the Goulburn Valley (regional) in Victoria, Australia.

Participants: 1000 households were recruited: 800 from western Melbourne (metropolitan) and 200 from the Goulburn Valley (regional).

Intervention: A thermal comfort and home energy efficiency upgrade of up to $AUD3500 per household.

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was the change in indoor temperature over winter and the secondary outcomes were changes in quality of life, healthcare use and costs, self-reported health measures, energy use and costs and humidity.

Results: A relatively low-cost and simple home upgrade (average cost $A2809) resulted in reduced gas consumption (-25.5 MJ/day) and increased indoor winter temperatures (average daily increase of 0.33°C), and a reduction of exposure to cold conditions (<18°C) by an average of 0.71 hours (43 min) per day. The intervention group experienced improved mental health as measured by the short-form 36 mental component summary and social care related quality of life measured by the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit, less breathlessness and lower overall healthcare costs (an average of $A887 per person) over the winter period.

Conclusions: The home upgrades significantly increased average winter indoor temperature, improved mental health and social care-related quality of life and made householders more comfortable while yielding reductions in overall healthcare use and costs.

Trial Registration Number: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12618000160235.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865758PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082340DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

victorian healthy
8
healthy homes
8
homes program
8
randomised control
8
control trial
8
group received
8
received upgrade
8
western melbourne
8
melbourne metropolitan
8
goulburn valley
8

Similar Publications