98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is marked by an excessive systemic accumulation of collagen. Recent literature implies that aortic stenosis is more prevalent in patients with SSc than previously thought. While there are limited feasibility studies on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in this population, the long-term outcomes remain uncertain.
Case Summary: We report two cases of patients with SSc who developed early structural valve deterioration following TAVR, necessitating successful redo-TAVR procedures. Both patients exhibited extensive soft tissue calcinosis as a manifestation of their underlying condition.
Discussion: The fibrotic and calcific processes inherent to certain SSc subtypes could potentially adversely impact the durability and functionality of transcatheter aortic valves. Our observation highlights the need for vigilant post-procedural surveillance and individualized management strategies in this unique patient population. Further investigation into the mechanisms underlying valve degeneration in this patient subset is warranted. Nevertheless, redo-TAVR procedure appears to be a viable option.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11839506 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytaf060 | DOI Listing |
Herz
September 2025
Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Strümpellstraße 39, 04289, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Since the earliest studies on transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), the heart team concept has been an integral component of treatment planning for patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS). The primary objective is to ensure patient-specific, guideline-based treatment through the structured involvement of all relevant medical disciplines. The TAVI heart team is strongly recommended with a class I indication in both European and US clinical guidelines.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMinerva Cardiol Angiol
September 2025
Norwich Medical School, Bob Champion Research and Education, Rosalind Franklin Road, Norwich, UK -
Introduction: Whilst aortic stenosis remains the most prevalent valvular abnormality, the management of asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis remains a clinical challenge. Recently, two randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) - EVOLVED (Early Intervention in Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis and Myocardial Fibrosis) and Early TAVR (Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement for Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis) - have been published, alongside an extended follow-up from the AVATAR (Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Conservative Treatment in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis) study.
Evidence Acquisition: In response, we conducted a systematic review of PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane databases, identifying RCTs up to October 29, 2024, that compared early intervention with conventional management.
Objective: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) represent less-invasive alternatives to conventional surgical aortic valve replacement. In contrast to Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Database data revealing <10% of all surgical aortic valve replacement procedures are performed via a minimally invasive approach, our center performs a high volume of MIAVR procedures. This propensity-score matched study aims to compare the outcomes of MIAVR versus TAVR in low-risk patients (STS Predicted Risk of Mortality <4%).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCan J Cardiol
September 2025
Clinical Department of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Interventions, University Hospital, Krakow, Poland; 2(nd) Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland. Electronic address:
Circulation
September 2025
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, OH.