A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3165
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 597
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 511
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 317
Function: require_once

Single-Institution Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Comparative Cost Analysis of Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion versus Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion in Geriatric Patients with Cervical Disc Herniation. | LitMetric

Category Ranking

98%

Total Visits

921

Avg Visit Duration

2 minutes

Citations

20

Article Abstract

Background: Despite the surge in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) procedures over the past 2 decades, there remains a paucity of data on their comparative costs in geriatric patients with cervical disc herniation. This study provides a comprehensive cost analysis of ACDF and PCDF in this patient population.

Methods: A total of 282 geriatric patients who underwent ACDF or PCDF for cervical disc herniation over a 12-year period were analyzed to assess total surgical costs, including preoperative, procedural, and postoperative expenses. Analysis of variance with post-hoc Tukey Honestly Significant Difference test was used in a propensity score-matched cohort to compare cost differences between ACDF and PCDF across various cost categories.

Results: In a geriatric cohort of 282 patients with cervical disc herniation meeting inclusion criteria, 221 (78.4%) underwent ACDF and 61 (21.6%) received PCDF (2-4 levels). The average age was 71.3 ± 5.6 years, with no significant demographic differences between groups. On analysis of variance, rehabilitation costs were 1.88 times higher (P < 0.001), and blood bank costs were 2.16 times higher (P = 0.04) for PCDF patients, corresponding with significantly greater estimated blood loss (209.9 ± 217.7 mL vs. 66.7 ± 107.0 mL; P < 0.001). After propensity score matching, PCDF remained associated with significantly higher rehabilitation costs (+170.79%; P < 0.001), blood bank costs (+139.29%; P = 0.005), and total procedural costs (+33.92%; P = 0.015).

Conclusions: ACDF procedures in geriatric patients with cervical disc herniation are significantly cheaper than PCDF in terms of rehabilitation and blood bank costs, offering valuable insights for optimizing neurosurgical decision-making and high-value care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123798DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cervical disc
20
disc herniation
20
geriatric patients
16
patients cervical
16
acdf pcdf
12
blood bank
12
bank costs
12
cervical
9
propensity score-matched
8
cost analysis
8

Similar Publications