98%
921
2 minutes
20
Background: The results of three modern randomized controlled trials have proved sublobar resection as an effective procedure for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) up to 2 cm. We aimed to examine whether sublobar resection is oncologically feasible and what constitutes adequate lymph node assessment for hypermetabolic clinical stage IA (cIA) NSCLC.
Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted in 589 patients who underwent lobectomy (n=526) or sublobar resection (n=63) for hypermetabolic cIA NSCLC [maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) ≥2.6 g/dL]. The primary outcomes (lung cancer-specific death and tumor recurrence) were compared in a competing risks framework for all patients and the propensity score matched pairs. Random forests were used to examine the variable importance for lung cancer-specific survival and tumor recurrence. Factors affecting pathological upstaging and recurrence-free survival were assessed by logistic regression analysis and Cox regression analysis, respectively.
Results: Sublobar resection had significantly higher lung cancer-specific cumulative incidence of death (LC-CID) and cumulative incidence of recurrence (CIR) than lobectomy after matching (5-year LC-CID, 20.8% . 6.5%, P<0.001; 5-year CIR, 37.9% . 14.8%, P<0.001). Wedge resection was an independent risk factor for both lung-cancer specific death [hazard ratio (HR) =4.17; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.07-8.36; P<0.001] and recurrence (HR =3.48; 95% CI: 1.91-6.33; P<0.001). Lymphadenectomy that failed to meet the lobe-specific nodal dissection (LSND) criteria correlated with decreased odds of pathological nodal upstaging [odds ratio (OR) =0.55; 95% CI: 0.34-0.87; P=0.01]. While patients with LSND had lower LC-CIR and CIR, there was no additional prognostic benefit of systemic nodal dissection (SND) over LSND.
Conclusions: Lobectomy was oncologically superior to sublobar resection as a curative-intent procedure for hypermetabolic cIA NSCLC. Lobectomy plus lobe-specific lymphadenectomy should be considered as the minimum standards of curative resection for hypermetabolic early-stage NSCLC in order to achieve more accurate pathological N staging and better cancer control.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11826270 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-804 | DOI Listing |
JTCVS Open
August 2025
Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Objective: To evaluate whether results of the JCOG0802/WJOG4607L trial, which demonstrated the superiority of segmentectomy over lobectomy in terms of overall survival for patients with peripheral small-sized lung cancer, are applicable to clinical practice.
Methods: In this single-center retrospective analysis, we categorized patients who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy during the enrollment period of the JCOG0802/WJOG4607L trial into 3 groups: patients enrolled in the trial (Cohort A), patients who were eligible but not enrolled (Cohort B), and ineligible patients (Cohort C). We assessed whether trial participants reflected typical patients seen in clinical practice (representativeness) and whether trial results could be applied in routine practice (generalizability) by comparing patient characteristics and survival between cohorts, using Cohort A as the reference.
Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg
September 2025
Department of Thoracic Surgery, New Cross Hospital, Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
Three-dimensional (3D) guided robotic-assisted thoracic surgery is increasingly recognized as the pioneering approach for the most complex of pulmonary resections, offering high-definition 3D visualization, enhanced instrument augmentation and tremor-free tissue articulation. Compared with open thoracotomy, the robotic platform is associated with reduced peri-operative morbidity, shorter hospital admissions and faster patient recovery. However, sublobar resections such as segmentectomies remain anatomically and technically demanding, particularly in the context of resecting multiple segments, as showcased in this right S1 and S2 segmentectomy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMultimed Man Cardiothorac Surg
September 2025
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St George’s Hospital, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
Three-dimensional (3D) guided robotic-assisted thoracic surgery is increasingly recognized as a leading technique for undertaking the most complex pulmonary resections, providing high-definition 3D visualization, advanced instrument control and tremor-free tissue handling. Compared with open thoracotomy, the robotic platform offers reduced peri-operative complications, shorter hospital stays and faster patient recovery. Nevertheless, sublobar resections, such as segmentectomies, remain both anatomically intricate and technically challenging, particularly when resecting multiple segments, as in this left S1 and S2 segmentectomy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Surg Oncol
September 2025
Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
J Surg Oncol
September 2025
Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Background And Objectives: Minimally invasive (MI) pulmonary metastasectomy may improve access in frail patients who are at high-risk for complications after thoracotomy. We compared postoperative complications among frail and non-frail patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy.
Methods: The Nationwide Readmissions Database (2017-2019) identified adult patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy.